BZA Packet 06 13 2022
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
REGULAR MEETING
Monday, June 13, 2022 – 6:00 PM
Board Meeting Room
39 Bank Street, SE,
Chatham, Virginia 24531
AGENDA
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
III. MOMENT OF SILENCE
IV. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
V. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
VI. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. BZA Minutes 05_09_2022
VII. OLD BUSINESS
VIII. NEW BUSINESS
IX. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT
X. PUBLIC HEARING
Pursuant to Article V, Division 7 of the Pittsylvania County Zoning Ordinance, we the
Board of Zoning Appeals have been empowered to hear and decide specific applications
and appeals in support of said ordinance. In accomplishing this important task we are
charged with promoting the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of
Pittsylvania County. We must insure that all our decisions and recommendations be
directed to these goals and that each be consistent with the environment, the
comprehensive plan and in the best interest of Pittsylvania County, its citizens and its
posterity. Anyone here to speak to the board, other than the applicant, regarding zoning
cases will be limited to (3) three minutes.
1. Case S-22-005 Louise Morrison; Special Use Permit for a Doublewide Mobile Home
Regular Meeting - June 13, 2022
2. Case S-22-007 Sally Norcutt; Special Use Permit for a Singlewide Mobile Home
3. Case S-22-008 Green Genie LLC; Special Use Permit for a Recreational Use (ATV
Trails)
4. Public Hearing: Case V-22-001 Tynesha Breedlove; Requesting a Variance to
Section 35-226. MINIMUM YARD DIMENSIONS. (A.) Front Setbacks.
XI. ADJOURNMENT
Board of Zoning Appeals
STAFF SUMMARY
Case: BZA Minutes
05_09_2022
District:
Zoning Request:
Agenda Date: June 13, 2022
Meeting History:
6.1
Packet Pg. 3
May 9, 2022
Regular Meeting
Pittsylvania County Board of Zoning Appeals
Regular Meeting
May 9, 2022
VIRGINIA: The Regular Meeting of the Pittsylvania County Board of Zoning Appeals was held
on May 9, 2022, in the Board Meeting Room, 39 Bank Street, SE, Chatham, Virginia. Chairman
R. Allan Easley, called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM. The following members were present:
Attendee Name Title Status Arrived
R. Allan Easley Chairman Present 6:02 PM
Ronald E. Merricks Vice-Chairman Present 5:59 PM
Ryland Brumfield Board Member Present 6:02 PM
Joseph A. Craddock Board Member Present 6:00 PM
Ann Deering Board Member Absent 6:00 PM
Hershel Stone Board Member Present 5:59 PM
Carroll Yeaman Board Member Present 6:03 PM
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Upon motion of Mr. Merricks, seconded by Mr. Yeaman, and by a unanimous vote, the agenda
was approved as presented.
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Ronald E. Merricks, Vice-Chairman
SECONDER: Carroll Yeaman, Board Member
AYES: Easley, Merricks, Brumfield, Craddock, Stone, Yeaman
ABSENT: Deering
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. BZA Minutes 04_11_2022
Upon motion of Mr. Craddock, seconded by Mr. Yeaman, and by a unanimous vote, the minutes
were approved as presented.
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Joseph A. Craddock, Board Member
SECONDER: Carroll Yeaman, Board Member
AYES: Easley, Merricks, Brumfield, Craddock, Stone, Yeaman
ABSENT: Deering
OLD BUSINESS
Mrs. Ragsdale reminded Board members to contact her regarding county email accounts that have
been set up for each board member.
NEW BUSINESS
There will be 3 cases for the month of June for Special Use Permits.
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 4 Attachment: BZA Minutes 05_09_2022 (3192 : BZA Minutes 05_09_2022)
CHAIRMAN'S REPORT
There was no Chairman's Report.
PUBLIC HEARING
1. Case S-22-004 Aquillas Kanagy and Jacob Mast; Special Use Permit for a Permanent
Sawmill
The zoning precepts were read by Mr. Easley to open the public hearing at 6:09 p.m. Mrs.
Ragsdale, Director of Community Development, reported that Aquillas Kanagy & Jacob Mast
petitioned for a Special Use Permit for a permanent sawmill on 351.38 acres, located on State
Road 678/Corner Road in the Banister Election District. Aquillas Kanagy represented the petition.
Mr. Merricks asked if a permit was issued for a sawmill, could future owners install a permanent
sawmill? Mrs. Ragsdale stated that future owners could install a permanent sawmill. Mr. Easley
stated this is a small operation, nothing to compare to the size of Gregory Sawmill. Mr. Easley
asked if the sawmill would be motorized? Mr. Kanagy says that a motor runs the sawmill, but it is
hand operated. Resident Jimmy Foster lives on Corner Road across from the operation and stated
he does not know they are there, so he is in favor of the sawmill. Kimberly Foster, who also lives
across from the property, said that noise has not been a factor. She stated that if they cannot hear
the sawmill in operation, others should not be able to hear it. Betty George spoke and said she is
the closest neighbor and cannot hear the sawmill while it is in operation. Mr. Easley closed the
public hearing at 6:20 p.m. Mr. Easley and Mr. Stone both visited the site, stated it is off the road
and in the woods and that they could not hear it in operation until they were right at the operation.
The Board discussed the petition as the Committee of the Whole. Whereas, Aquillas Kanagy &
Jacob Mast has petitioned the Board of Zoning Appeals for a Special Use Permit for a permanent
sawmill. A motion was made by Mr. Merricks and seconded by Mr. Stone, to recommend the
Board of Zoning Appeals grant the Special Use Permit.
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Ronald E. Merricks, Vice-Chairman
SECONDER: Hershel Stone, Board Member
AYES: Easley, Merricks, Brumfield, Craddock, Stone, Yeaman
ABSENT: Deering
2. Case S-22-006 Michael Mollohan; Special Use Permit for a Double-Wide Mobile Home
Mr. Easley opened the public hearing at 6:22 p.m. Mrs. Ragsdale, Director of Communi ty
Development, reported that Michael Mollohan petitioned for a Special Use Permit for a double-
wide mobile home on 0.90 acres, located on Drucker Court in the Tunstall Election District. Mrs.
Ragsdale represented the petition. There was no opposition to the petition. Mr. Easley closed the
public hearing at 6:24 p.m. The Board discussed the petition as the Committee of the Whole.
Whereas, Michael Mollohan has petitioned the Board of Zoning Appeals for a Special Use Permit
for a double-wide mobile home. A motion was made by Mr. Yeaman and seconded by Mr.
Brumfield, to recommend the Board of Zoning Appeals grant the Special Use Permit.
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 5 Attachment: BZA Minutes 05_09_2022 (3192 : BZA Minutes 05_09_2022)
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Carroll Yeaman, Board Member
SECONDER: Ryland Brumfield, Board Member
AYES: Easley, Merricks, Brumfield, Craddock, Stone, Yeaman
ABSENT: Deering
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 6:25 p.m.
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: BZA Minutes 05_09_2022 (3192 : BZA Minutes 05_09_2022)
Board of Zoning Appeals
STAFF SUMMARY
Case: Case S-22-005 Louise
Morrison
District: Banister Election District
Zoning Request: SUP
Agenda Date: June 13, 2022
Meeting History:
SUBJECT
Requested by Louise Morrison, for a Special Use Permit for the placement of a doublewide
mobile home in accordance with Pittsylvania County Code § 35-223. The property is 1.0 acres,
located on State Road 685/Telegraph Road in the Banister Election District and shown on the
Tap Maps as GPIN # 2550-84-5062.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
Joseph and Louise Morrison are requesting a Special Use Permit to allow for the placement of a
double-wide mobile home on their property to be used as a personal residence. PCC § 35-223
requires a Special Use Permit for mobile homes under the R-1 zoning classification. The
property is currently occupied by a single-family dwelling that was damaged during a fire. This
structure is currently being demolished. There are other single-wide mobile homes and double-
wide mobile homes in the general area. If a Special Use Permit is granted, all applicable setback
requirements and Building Code regulations would have to be met before the mobile home could
be placed on the property.
FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION
The Comprehensive Plan designates the future land use as Agricultural and Rural Residential.
ZONING OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
Mostly surrounded by A-1, Agricultural District, and R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision
District
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
N/A
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends APPROVAL of Case S-22-005 as submitted.
BZA MOTIONS:
1. Recommend approval of Case S-22-005 as submitted.
10.1
Packet Pg. 7
2. Recommend approval of Case S-22-005 subject to conditions by the Board of Zoning
Appeals.
3. Recommend denial of Case S-22-005 as submitted.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Application
B. Maps
C. Letter of Intent
D. Executive Summary
E. Petition
F. Sign Affidavit
G. Adjacent Parcel Owners
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
On May 3, 2022, the Planning Commission recommended by a 7 to 0 vote, with no opposition,
that the petitioner’s request be granted as submitted.
10.1
Packet Pg. 8
10.1.a
Packet Pg. 9 Attachment: S-22-005 Joseph & Louise Morrison App (3188 : Case S-22-005 Louise Morrison)
10.1.a
Packet Pg. 10 Attachment: S-22-005 Joseph & Louise Morrison App (3188 : Case S-22-005 Louise Morrison)
10.1.a
Packet Pg. 11 Attachment: S-22-005 Joseph & Louise Morrison App (3188 : Case S-22-005 Louise Morrison)
10.1.a
Packet Pg. 12 Attachment: S-22-005 Joseph & Louise Morrison App (3188 : Case S-22-005 Louise Morrison)
10.1.a
Packet Pg. 13 Attachment: S-22-005 Joseph & Louise Morrison App (3188 : Case S-22-005 Louise Morrison)
10.1.a
Packet Pg. 14 Attachment: S-22-005 Joseph & Louise Morrison App (3188 : Case S-22-005 Louise Morrison)
10.1.a
Packet Pg. 15 Attachment: S-22-005 Joseph & Louise Morrison App (3188 : Case S-22-005 Louise Morrison)
10.1.b
Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: S-22-005 Joseph & Louise Morrison Map (3188 : Case S-22-005 Louise Morrison)
Board of Zoning Appeals
STAFF SUMMARY
Case: Case S-22-007 Sally
Norcutt
District: Banister Election District
Zoning Request: SUP
Agenda Date: June 13, 2022
Meeting History:
SUBJECT
Requested by Sally Norcutt, for a Special Use Permit for the placement of a singlewide mobile
home in accordance with Pittsylvania County Code § 35-223. The property is 3.28 acres, located
on State Road 691/Motley Road in the Banister Election District and shown on the Tap Maps as
GPIN # 2446-09-9440.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
Sally Norcutt is requesting a Special Use Permit to allow for the placement of a single-wide
mobile home on the subject property to be used as a personal residence. PCC § 35-223 requires a
Special Use Permit for mobile homes under the R-1 zoning classification. The property is
currently vacant. There are other single-wide mobile homes and double-wide mobile homes in
the general area. If a Special Use Permit is granted, all applicable setback requirements and
Building Code regulations would have to be met before the mobile home could be placed on the
property.
FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION
The Comprehensive Plan designates the future land use as Agricultural and Rural Residential.
ZONING OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
Mostly surrounded by A-1, Agricultural District, and R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision
District
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
N/A
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends APPROVAL of Case S-22-007 as submitted.
PLANNING COMMISSION MOTIONS:
1. Recommend approval of Case S-22-007 as submitted.
2. Recommend approval of Case S-22-007 subject to conditions by the Board of Zoning
Appeals
10.2
Packet Pg. 17
3. Recommend denial of Case S-22-007 as submitted.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Application
B. Maps
C. Letter of Intent
D. Executive Summary
E. Petition
F. Sign Affidavit
G. Adjacent Parcel Owners
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
On May 3, 2022, the Planning Commission recommended by a 7 to 0 vote, with no opposition,
that the petitioner’s request be granted as submitted.
10.2
Packet Pg. 18
10.2.a
Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: S-22-007 Sally Norcutt App (3189 : Case S-22-007 Sally Norcutt)
10.2.a
Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: S-22-007 Sally Norcutt App (3189 : Case S-22-007 Sally Norcutt)
10.2.a
Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: S-22-007 Sally Norcutt App (3189 : Case S-22-007 Sally Norcutt)
10.2.a
Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: S-22-007 Sally Norcutt App (3189 : Case S-22-007 Sally Norcutt)
10.2.a
Packet Pg. 23 Attachment: S-22-007 Sally Norcutt App (3189 : Case S-22-007 Sally Norcutt)
10.2.a
Packet Pg. 24 Attachment: S-22-007 Sally Norcutt App (3189 : Case S-22-007 Sally Norcutt)
10.2.b
Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: S-22-007 Sally Norcutt Map (3189 : Case S-22-007 Sally Norcutt)
Board of Zoning Appeals
STAFF SUMMARY
Case: Case S-22-008 Green
Genie LLC
District: Banister Election District
Zoning Request: SUP
Agenda Date: June 13, 2022
Meeting History:
SUBJECT
Requested by Green Genie, Inc., for a Special Use Permit for a Recreational Use (ATV Trails).
The property 322.85 acres, located on State Road 686/Elkhorn Road, in the Banister Election
District and shown on the Tap Map as GPIN #s 2486-41-1819, 2486-26-0293, and 2486-05-
3039.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
Green Genie, LLC is requesting a Special Use Permit to operate a Recreational Use (ATV Trails)
on the subject properties. The subject properties are zoned A-1, Agricultural District. According
to Pittsylvania County Code § 35-179, Recreational Uses require a Special Use Permit.
A Special Use Permit was granted on July 12, 2021 for ATV Trails on an adjacent property
owned by Green Genie, LLC. One of the subject properties was recently rezoned to A-1,
Agricultural District, to allow for Recreational Uses and the other two (2) were recently acquired
to create the area needed to propose an expansion their current operation. Staff is recommending
that the same conditions be applied to this Special Use Permit if approved.
FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION
The Comprehensive Plan designates the future land use as Agricultural and Rural Residential.
ZONING OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
Mostly surrounded by A-1, Agricultural District, R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District,
and B-2, Business District, General zoned properties.
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
A site plan is enclosed in the board packet.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends APPROVAL of the SUP request for ATV Trails with the following
conditions:
1. Days of operation shall be limited to Thursday-Sunday.
10.3
Packet Pg. 26
2. Hours of operation shall be limited to 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Thursday through Saturday
and 1:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Sunday.
3. No alcohol permitted on premises.
4. Must maintain a 100-foot vegetative buffer along all exterior property lines. This does
not apply to interior property lines within the total project area.
5. Must maintain a natural buffer along all waterways.
6. Must remain in compliance with all applicable Erosion and Sediment Control and
Stormwater regulations
7. Must remain in compliance with all applicable Health Department regulations
8. Night rides are permitted once per calendar year until 2:00 a.m.
PLANNING COMMISSION MOTIONS:
1. Recommend approval of Case S-22-008 as submitted.
2. Recommend approval of Case S-22-008 subject to conditions by staff.
3. Recommend approval of Case S-22-008 subject to conditions by the Board of Zoning
Appeals
4. Recommend denial of Case S-22-008 as submitted.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Application
B. Maps
C. Letter of Intent
D. Executive Summary
E. Petition
F. Sign Affidavit
G. Adjacent Parcel Owners
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
On May 3, 2022, the Planning Commission recommended by a 7 to 0 vote, with no opposition,
that the petitioner’s request be granted with the conditions submitted by staff.
10.3
Packet Pg. 27
10.3.a
Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: S-22-008 Green Genie App (3190 : Case S-22-008 Green Genie LLC)
10.3.a
Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: S-22-008 Green Genie App (3190 : Case S-22-008 Green Genie LLC)
10.3.a
Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: S-22-008 Green Genie App (3190 : Case S-22-008 Green Genie LLC)
10.3.a
Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: S-22-008 Green Genie App (3190 : Case S-22-008 Green Genie LLC)
10.3.a
Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: S-22-008 Green Genie App (3190 : Case S-22-008 Green Genie LLC)
10.3.a
Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: S-22-008 Green Genie App (3190 : Case S-22-008 Green Genie LLC)
10.3.a
Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: S-22-008 Green Genie App (3190 : Case S-22-008 Green Genie LLC)
10.3.b
Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: S-22-008 Green Genie Agreement (3190 : Case S-22-008 Green Genie LLC)
10.3.b
Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: S-22-008 Green Genie Agreement (3190 : Case S-22-008 Green Genie LLC)
10.3.b
Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: S-22-008 Green Genie Agreement (3190 : Case S-22-008 Green Genie LLC)
10.3.b
Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: S-22-008 Green Genie Agreement (3190 : Case S-22-008 Green Genie LLC)
10.3.b
Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: S-22-008 Green Genie Agreement (3190 : Case S-22-008 Green Genie LLC)
10.3.b
Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: S-22-008 Green Genie Agreement (3190 : Case S-22-008 Green Genie LLC)
10.3.b
Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: S-22-008 Green Genie Agreement (3190 : Case S-22-008 Green Genie LLC)
10.3.b
Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: S-22-008 Green Genie Agreement (3190 : Case S-22-008 Green Genie LLC)
10.3.b
Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: S-22-008 Green Genie Agreement (3190 : Case S-22-008 Green Genie LLC)
10.3.b
Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: S-22-008 Green Genie Agreement (3190 : Case S-22-008 Green Genie LLC)
10.3.b
Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: S-22-008 Green Genie Agreement (3190 : Case S-22-008 Green Genie LLC)
10.3.b
Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: S-22-008 Green Genie Agreement (3190 : Case S-22-008 Green Genie LLC)
10.3.b
Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: S-22-008 Green Genie Agreement (3190 : Case S-22-008 Green Genie LLC)
10.3.b
Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: S-22-008 Green Genie Agreement (3190 : Case S-22-008 Green Genie LLC)
10.3.b
Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: S-22-008 Green Genie Agreement (3190 : Case S-22-008 Green Genie LLC)
10.3.b
Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: S-22-008 Green Genie Agreement (3190 : Case S-22-008 Green Genie LLC)
10.3.b
Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: S-22-008 Green Genie Agreement (3190 : Case S-22-008 Green Genie LLC)
10.3.b
Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: S-22-008 Green Genie Agreement (3190 : Case S-22-008 Green Genie LLC)
10.3.b
Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: S-22-008 Green Genie Agreement (3190 : Case S-22-008 Green Genie LLC)
10.3.b
Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: S-22-008 Green Genie Agreement (3190 : Case S-22-008 Green Genie LLC)
10.3.b
Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: S-22-008 Green Genie Agreement (3190 : Case S-22-008 Green Genie LLC)
10.3.b
Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: S-22-008 Green Genie Agreement (3190 : Case S-22-008 Green Genie LLC)
10.3.b
Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: S-22-008 Green Genie Agreement (3190 : Case S-22-008 Green Genie LLC)
10.3.c
Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: S-22-008 Green Genie Maps (3190 : Case S-22-008 Green Genie LLC)
10.3.c
Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: S-22-008 Green Genie Maps (3190 : Case S-22-008 Green Genie LLC)
10.3.c
Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: S-22-008 Green Genie Maps (3190 : Case S-22-008 Green Genie LLC)
Board of Zoning Appeals
STAFF SUMMARY
Case: Public Hearing: Case V-
22-001 Tynesha
Breedlove
District: Westover District Election District
Zoning Request: Variance
Agenda Date: June 13, 2022
Meeting History:
BACKGROUND:
Requested by Tynesha Breedlove, for a Variance to Section 35-226. MINIMUM YARD
DIMENSIONS. (A.) Front Setback, Setback from the nearest point on house or principal
structure (including porches or stoops or any accessory building) shall be thirty-five (35) feet
from the edge of right-of-way. The property is located on State Road 1555/Fox Trail Road, in the
Westover Election District and shown on the Tax Map as GPIN# 2309-11-4940.
DISCUSSION:
The subject property is currently zoned R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District. The
Pittsylvania County Code § 35-226 MINIMUM YARD DIMENSIONS. (A.) Front Setback,
states “Setback from the nearest point on house or principal structure (including porches or
stoops or any accessory building) shall be thirty-five (35) feet from the edge of right of way.”
The majority of the property falls within the floodplain as determined by FEMA. Regulations in
the Uniform Statewide Building Code (“USBC”) and Pittsylvania County Code, Chapter 23,
Flood Plain Management, require the dwelling to be constructed outside of the Floodplain.
Additionally, Virginia Department of Environmental Health regulations regarding the placement
of the septic system and associated drain fields and the setback requirements set forth in Virginia
State Regulations further restrict where the structure can be placed. Due to the various
regulations that must be met and the size and shape of the portion of the lot that is out of the
floodplain, the applicant is requesting a variance of eleven (11) feet from the required thirty-five
(35) foot setback.
CRITERA ANALYSIS
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, general or special, a variance shall be granted if the
evidence shows that the strict application of the terms of the ordinance would unreasonably
restrict the utilization of the property or that the granting of the variance would alleviate a
hardship due to a physical condition relating to the property or improvements thereon at the
time of the effective date of the ordinance, or alleviate a hardship by granting a reasonable
modification to a property or improvements thereon requested by, or on behalf of, a person with
a disability,
10.4
Packet Pg. 61
1. The property interest for which the variance is being requested was acquired in
good faith and any hardship was not created by the applicant for the variance;
The hardship claimed by the applicant is due to the size and shape of the property and the
vast percentage that falls within the floodplain. The property is narrow and almost three
(3) quarters of the it falls within the floodplain. Soil work conducted dictated when the
septic system had to be located, further restricting where the dwelling could be placed.
Therefore, this application does meet this criterion.
2. The granting of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent
property and nearby properties in the proximity of that geographical area;
The properties in this area are residential and the variance of eleven (11) feet would not
negatively impact adjacent property owners or impact site distances for traffic on this low
volume roadway. Therefore, this application does meet this criterion.
3. The condition or situation of the property concerned is not of so general or
recurring a nature as to make reasonably practicable the formulation of a general
regulation to be adopted as an amendment to the ordinance;
Generally, properties that share this zoning classification can meet the required setbacks.
This property cannot due to the percentage of the property within the floodplain. Most
properties with this zoning designation are either not adjacent to a floodplain or are
minimally impacted. Therefore, this application does meet this criterion.
4. The granting of the variance does not result in a use that is not otherwise permitted
on such property or a change in the zoning classification of the property;
The granting of a variance does not change the zoning classification or allow for a use
that is not otherwise permitted. Therefore, this application does meet this criterion.
5. The relief or remedy sought by the variance application is not available through a
special exception process that is authorized in the ordinance pursuant to subdivision
6 of § 15.2-2309 or the process for modification of a zoning ordinance pursuant to
subdivision A 4 of § 15.2-2286 at the time of the filing of the variance application.
The special exception process does not apply to this situation. An amendment to the
Zoning Ordinance is not needed for this situation as the need for this variance is due to
the narrowness of the subject property and the percentage of the property that falls within
the floodplain. Therefore, this application does meet this criterion.
This variance request meets five (5) of the five (5) criteria needed to grant a variance.
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
A. Application
10.4
Packet Pg. 62
B. Map
C. Letter of Intent
D. Executive Summary
E. Petition
F. Sign Affidavit
G. Adjacent Parcel Owners
10.4
Packet Pg. 63
10.4.a
Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: V-22-001 Breedlove App (3191 : Public Hearing: Case V-22-001 Tynesha Breedlove)
10.4.a
Packet Pg. 65 Attachment: V-22-001 Breedlove App (3191 : Public Hearing: Case V-22-001 Tynesha Breedlove)
10.4.a
Packet Pg. 66 Attachment: V-22-001 Breedlove App (3191 : Public Hearing: Case V-22-001 Tynesha Breedlove)
10.4.a
Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: V-22-001 Breedlove App (3191 : Public Hearing: Case V-22-001 Tynesha Breedlove)
10.4.a
Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: V-22-001 Breedlove App (3191 : Public Hearing: Case V-22-001 Tynesha Breedlove)
10.4.a
Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: V-22-001 Breedlove App (3191 : Public Hearing: Case V-22-001 Tynesha Breedlove)
10.4.a
Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: V-22-001 Breedlove App (3191 : Public Hearing: Case V-22-001 Tynesha Breedlove)
10.4.b
Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: V-22-001 Breedlove Map (3191 : Public Hearing: Case V-22-001 Tynesha Breedlove)