The URL can be used to link to this page

PC 07 05 2022 PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING Tuesday, July 5, 2022 – 7:00 PM Board Meeting Room 39 Bank Street, SE, Chatham, Virginia 24531 AGENDA I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. MOMENT OF SILENCE IV. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE V. HEARING OF CITIZENS Each person addressing the Board under Hearing of the Citizens shall be a resident or land owner of the County, or the registered agent of such resident or land owner. Each person shall step up, give his/her name and district in an audible tone of voice for the record, and unless further time is granted by the Chairman, shall limit his/her address to three (3) minutes. No person shall be permitted to address the Board more than once during Hearing of the Citizens. All remarks shall be addressed to the Board as a body and not to any individual member thereof. Hearing of the Citizens shall last for a maximum of forty-five (45) minutes. Any individual that is signed up to speak during said section who does not get the opportunity to do so because of the aforementioned time limit, shall be given speaking priority at the next Board meeting. Absent Chairman’s approval, no person shall be able to speak who has not signed up. VI. APPROVAL OF AGENDA VII. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. PC Minutes 06_07_2022 VIII. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT IX. PUBLIC HEARING Regular Meeting - July 5, 2022 Pursuant to Article V, Division 7 of the Pittsylvania County Zoning Ordinance, we the Planning Commission have been empowered to hear and decide specific applications in support of said ordinance and to make recommendations to the Board of Supervisors or the Board of Zoning Appeals. In accomplishing this important task, we are charged with promoting the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Pittsylvania County. We must insure that all our decisions and recommendations be directed to these goals and that each be consistent with the environment, the comprehensive plan and in the best interest of Pittsylvania County, its citizens and its posterity. Anyone here to speak to the board regarding zoning cases will be limited to (3) three minutes. Case Public Hearing: Case R-22-020 Lisa Wilkinson: Public Hearing: Case R-22- 020 Lisa Wilkinson; Rezoning from R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District, to A-1, Agricultural District (Horne) Case Public Hearing: Case R-22-022 Donnie Devall, Jr.: Public Hearing: Case R-22-022 Donnie Devall, Jr.; Rezoning from R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District, to A-1, Agricultural District (Haymore) Case Public Hearing: Case R-22-024 William and Kristy Astin: Public Hearing: Case R-22-024 William and Kristy Astin; Rezoning from R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District, to A-1, Agricultural District (Horne) Case Public Hearing: Case R-22-025 Charles Turner and Michael Turner: Public Hearing: Case R-22-025 Charles Turner and Michael Turner; Rezoning from R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District, to A-1, Agricultural District (Oakes) Case Public Hearing: Case S-22-014 Joshua and Amy Jennings: Public Hearing: Case S-22-014 Joshua and Amy Jennings; Special Use Permit for an Indoor Gun Range (Oakes) Case Public Hearing: Case S-22-015 Bradley Boswell: Public Hearing: Case S-22- 015 Bradley Boswell; Special Use Permit for a Double-wide Mobile Home (Mease) Case Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC: Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC; Special Use Permit for a Utility Scale Solar Energy Facility (Henderson) Case Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC: Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC; Special Use Permit for a Utility Scale Solar Energy Facility (Waters) X. OLD BUSINESS XI. NEW BUSINESS XII. ADJOURNMENT Regular Meeting - July 5, 2022 Planning Commission STAFF SUMMARY Case: PC Minutes 06-07-2022 District: Zoning Request: Agenda Date: July 05, 2022 Meeting History: 7.1 Packet Pg. 4 June 7, 2022 Regular Meeting Pittsylvania County Planning Commission Regular Meeting June 7, 2022 VIRGINIA: The Regular Meeting of the Pittsylvania County Planning Commission was held on June 7, 2022, in the Board Meeting Room, 39 Bank Street, SE, Chatham, Virginia. Chairman - Westover District H.F. Haymore, called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. The following members were present: Attendee Name Title Status Arrived H.F. Haymore Chairman - Westover District Present 6:28 PM Nathan Harker Vice Chairman - Staunton River District Present 6:27 PM Colette Henderson Member - Banister District Absent 6:24 PM Janet Mease Member - Callands-Gretna District Present 6:25 PM Brian K. Horne Member - Dan River District Present 6:27 PM Gary Oakes Member - Tunstall District Present 6:28 PM Richard Waters Member - Chatham-Blairs District Present 6:27 PM Darrell Dalton Board of Supervisors Rep Present 6:33 PM HEARING OF CITIZENS No citizens came forward to speak. APPROVAL OF AGENDA A motion was made by Mr. Harker, seconded by Mrs. Mease, and by a seven (7) to zero (0) vote, the agenda was approved as presented. RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Nathan Harker, Vice Chairman - Staunton River District SECONDER: Janet Mease, Member - Callands-Gretna District AYES: Haymore, Harker, Mease, Horne, Oakes, Waters, Dalton ABSENT: Henderson APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. PC Minutes 05_03_2022 A motion was made by Mr. Waters, seconded by Mr. Horne, and by a seven (7) to zero (0) vote, the minutes were approved as presented. RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Richard Waters, Member - Chatham-Blairs District SECONDER: Brian K. Horne, Member - Dan River District AYES: Haymore, Harker, Mease, Horne, Oakes, Waters, Dalton ABSENT: Henderson CHAIRMAN'S REPORT There was no Chairman's Report. 7.1.a Packet Pg. 5 Attachment: 06_07_2022 PC Minutes -packet (3252 : PC Minutes 06_07_2022) PUBLIC HEARING 1. Public Hearing: Case R-22-013 Nguyen Properties, LLC; Rezoning from RC-1, Residential Combined Subdivision District, to MHP, Residential Manufactured Housing Park District (Oakes) Mr. Haymore opened the public hearing at 7:03 p.m. Mrs. Ragsdale, Director of Community Development, reported that Nguyen Properties, LLC, had petitioned to rezone 6.25 acres, located on State Road 722/Oakwood Drive from RC-1, Residential Combined Subdivision District, to MHP, Manufactured Housing Park District. Rick Fain represented the petition on behalf of Nguyen Properties, LLC. Mr. Fain stated that the property currently has 4 mobile home sites and they would like to add two (2) more for a total of six (6). He stated the well and septic system can accommodate six (6) homes. Jim Davis was first to speak in opposition to the rezoning of this property due to safety reasons. He stated the speed limit is 25 mph, and from a safety point of view, this property is not safe for a mobile home park. Mr. Davis would like for the rezoning request to be denied. RT Collins was next to speak. She provided photos of Oakwood Drive and the current state of the mobile home park. She stated grass is not mowed and very tall and there are piles of trash and debris on property. Doris Thomas spoke next. Her property is connected to the mobile home park, and she does not want to see the capacity increased. She stated that it was denied once before in 1998. She has been a resident of Oakwood Drive for 52 years and she feels this will decrease her property value tremendously. She also stated that the property has not been maintained, and that rubbish, weeds, and debris washes into her pond. She said all the homes are in poor condition and that children trespass constantly and take mail from her mailbox. Dewey Brown was last to speak, stating that he echoed sentiments of the last two speakers. His mother's property borders the mobile home park on two sides. He stated that children trespass and get into the horse pasture. He also said that they are always picking up trash that has blown over from the mobile home property and debris washes into the pond on his mother's property. Mr. Fain came back to state that there are no plans to exceed six (6) mobile homes on the property. A letter of petition opposing the rezoning case from neighboring residents was presented to the board. Mr. Harker asked Mrs. Ragsdale about zoning for six (6) mobile homes. Mrs. Ragsdale stated that there were originally six (6) mobile homes on the property but over the years it had been reduced to four (4). She explained that since the mobile homes were legal non-conforming uses, if a 2-year window expires without replacing the homes the legal nonconforming status is lost and you lose the ability to replace the homes without rezoning to bring the property into compliance with the ordinance. She stated that to add two (2) more homes the property must be rezoned to MHP, Residential Manufactured Housing Park District. Mr. Oakes visited the property and stated it looks abandoned. He said the driveway going into the property is an issue and he does not want to grant the rezoning request. Mr. Waters stated the entrance would need to be a commercial entrance and VDOT would not approve that according to an e-mail submitted by a VDOT Engineer. Mr. Haymore closed the public hearing at 7:24 p.m. A motion was made by Mr. Oakes, seconded by Mr. Harker, that the rezoning request be denied. 7.1.a Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: 06_07_2022 PC Minutes -packet (3252 : PC Minutes 06_07_2022) RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Gary Oakes, Member - Tunstall District SECONDER: Nathan Harker, Vice Chairman - Staunton River District AYES: Haymore, Harker, Mease, Horne, Oakes, Waters, Dalton ABSENT: Henderson 2. Public Hearing: Case R-22-016 Jasmin Ruiz; Rezoning from B-2, Business District, General, to R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District (Mease) Mr. Haymore opened the public hearing at 7:26 p.m. Mrs. Ragsdale, Director of Community Development, reported that Jasmin Ruiz had petitioned to rezone 2.16 acres, located on State Road 799/Climax Road, in the Callands-Gretna Election District from B-2 Business District General, to R-1 Residential Suburban Subdivision District to allow the property to be used as a single-family dwelling. Jasmin Ruiz represented the petition. There was no opposition to the petition. Mr. Haymore closed the public hearing at 7:28 p.m. A motion was made by Mrs. Mease, seconded by Mr. Horne, to recommend the Board of Supervisors grant the rezoning request. Motion passed by a seven (7) to zero (0) vote. RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Janet Mease, Member - Callands-Gretna District SECONDER: Brian K. Horne, Member - Dan River District AYES: Haymore, Harker, Mease, Horne, Oakes, Waters, Dalton ABSENT: Henderson 3. Public Hearing: Case R-22-017 Bradley and Heather Barron; Rezoning from RE, Residential Estates District, to A-1, Agricultural District (Mease) Mr. Haymore opened the public hearing at 7:29 p.m. Mrs. Ragsdale, Director of Community Development, reported that Bradley & Heather Barron had petitioned to rezone 23.81 acres, located on Atlantic Timber Lane, in the Callands-Gretna Election District from RE, Residential Estates District, to A-1 Agricultural District to allow for placement of an accessory structure and to allow for a Class B Home Occupation. Bradley Barron represented the petition. There was no opposition to the petition. Mr. Haymore closed the public hearing at 7:30 p.m. A motion was made by Mrs. Mease, seconded by Mr. Harker, to recommend the Board of Supervisors grant the rezoning request. Motion passed by a seven (7) to zero (0) vote. RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Janet Mease, Member - Callands-Gretna District SECONDER: Nathan Harker, Vice Chairman - Staunton River District AYES: Haymore, Harker, Mease, Horne, Oakes, Waters, Dalton ABSENT: Henderson 4. Public Hearing: Case R-22-018 Robert and Angela Carlberg; Rezoning from R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District, to A-1, Agricultural District (Harker) Mr. Haymore opened the public hearing at 7:32 p.m. Mrs. Ragsdale, Di rector of Community Development, reported that Robert & Angela Carlberg had petitioned to rezone 10.41 acres, located on Reservoir View Drive, in the Staunton River Election District from R-1, Residential 7.1.a Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: 06_07_2022 PC Minutes -packet (3252 : PC Minutes 06_07_2022) Suburban Subdivision District, to A-1 Agricultural District to allow for placement of an accessory structure. Robert Carlberg represented the petition. There was no opposition to the petition. Mr. Haymore closed the public hearing at 7:33 p.m. A motion was made by Mr. Harker, seconded by Mr. Waters, to recommend the Board of Supervisors grant the rezoning request. Motion passed by a seven (7) to zero (0) vote. RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Nathan Harker, Vice Chairman - Staunton River District SECONDER: Richard Waters, Member - Chatham-Blairs District AYES: Haymore, Harker, Mease, Horne, Oakes, Waters, Dalton ABSENT: Henderson 5. Public Hearing: Case R-22-019 Industrial Development Authority of Pittsylvania County, Virginia; Rezoning from M-1, Industrial District, Light Industry, to M-2, Industrial District, Heavy Industry (Oakes) Mr. Haymore opened the public hearing at 7:34 p.m. Mrs. Ragsdale, Director of Community Development, reported that The Industrial Development Authority Pittsylvania County had petitioned to rezone 36.5 acres, located on Brosville Industrial Trail, in the Tunstall Election District from M-1, Industrial District, Light Industry, to M-2, Industrial District, Heavy Industry, to allow for more intensive industrial uses. Mrs. Ragsdale represented the petition. There was no opposition to the petition. Mr. Haymore closed the public hearing at 7:35 p.m. A motion was made by Mr. Oakes, seconded by Mr. Harker, to recommend the Board of Supervisors grant the rezoning request. Motion passed by a seven (7) to zero (0) vote. RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Gary Oakes, Member - Tunstall District SECONDER: Nathan Harker, Vice Chairman - Staunton River District AYES: Haymore, Harker, Mease, Horne, Oakes, Waters, Dalton ABSENT: Henderson 6. Public Hearing: Case R-22-023 Industrial Development Authority of Pittsylvania County, Virginia; Rezoning from M-1, Industrial District, Light Industry, to M-2, Industrial District, Heavy Industry (Horne) Mr. Haymore opened the public hearing at 7:36 p.m. Mrs. Ragsdale, Director of Community Development, reported that The Industrial Development Authority Pittsylvania County had petitioned to rezone 51.04 acres, located on State Road 1299/Cane Creek Parkway, in the Dan River Election District from M-1, Industrial District, Light Industry, to M-2, Industrial District, Heavy Industry, to allow for more intensive industrial uses. Mrs. Ragsdale represented the petition. There was no opposition to the petition. Mr. Haymore closed the public hearing at 7:37 p.m. A motion was made by Mr. Horne, seconded by Mr. Waters, to recommend the Board of Supervisors grant the rezoning request. Motion passed by a seven (7) to zero (0) vote. 7.1.a Packet Pg. 8 Attachment: 06_07_2022 PC Minutes -packet (3252 : PC Minutes 06_07_2022) RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Brian K. Horne, Member - Dan River District SECONDER: Richard Waters, Member - Chatham-Blairs District AYES: Haymore, Harker, Mease, Horne, Oakes, Waters, Dalton ABSENT: Henderson 7. Public Hearing: Case S-22-009 Mark Blanchet; Special Use Permit for a Campground (Oakes) Mr. Haymore opened the public hearing at 7:38 p.m. Mrs. Ragsdale, Director of Community Development, reported that Mark Blanchet had petitioned for a Special Use Permit for a Campground on 19.76 acres, located on Highway 58, in the Tunstall Election District. Mark Blanchet represented the petition. There was no opposition to the petition. Mr. Haymore closed the public hearing at 7:40 p.m. A motion was made by Mr. Oakes, seconded by Mr. Dalton, to recommend the Board of Zoning Appeals grant the Special Use Permit with the conditions by Staff. Motion passed by a seven (7) to zero (0) vote. RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Gary Oakes, Member - Tunstall District SECONDER: Darrell Dalton, Board of Supervisors Rep AYES: Haymore, Harker, Mease, Horne, Oakes, Waters, Dalton ABSENT: Henderson 8. Public Hearing: Case S-22-010 Debra Goodwin; Special Use Permit for the Placement of a Double-wide Mobile Home (Oakes) Mr. Haymore opened the public hearing at 7:42 p.m. Mrs. Ragsdale, Director of Community Development, reported that Debra Goodwin had petitioned for a Special Use Permit for a Double- Wide Mobile home on 1.56 acres, located on Dry Fork Road, in the Tunstall Election District. Debra Goodwin represented the petition. There was no opposition to the petition. Mr. Haymore closed the public hearing at 7:42 p.m. A motion was made by Mr. Oakes, seconded by Mr. Horne, to recommend the Board of Zoning Appeals grant the Special Use Permit. Motion passed by a seven (7) to zero (0) vote. RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Gary Oakes, Member - Tunstall District SECONDER: Brian K. Horne, Member - Dan River District AYES: Haymore, Harker, Mease, Horne, Oakes, Waters, Dalton ABSENT: Henderson 9. Public Hearing: Case S-22-012 Donna Clay; Special Use Permit for a Public Garage (Horne) Mr. Haymore opened the public hearing at 7:43 p.m. Mrs. Ragsdale, Director of Community Development, reported that Donna Clay had petitioned for a Special Use Permit for a Public Garage on 5.5 acres, located on State Road 1246, in the Dan River Election District. Ricky Clay represented the petition. There was no opposition to the petition. Mr. Haymore closed the public hearing at 7:44 p.m. A motion was made by Mr. Horne, seconded by Mrs. Mease, to recommend 7.1.a Packet Pg. 9 Attachment: 06_07_2022 PC Minutes -packet (3252 : PC Minutes 06_07_2022) the Board of Zoning Appeals grant the Special Use Permit with the conditions by Staff. Motion passed by a seven (7) to zero (0) vote. RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Brian K. Horne, Member - Dan River District SECONDER: Janet Mease, Member - Callands-Gretna District AYES: Haymore, Harker, Mease, Horne, Oakes, Waters, Dalton ABSENT: Henderson OLD BUSINESS There was no old business. NEW BUSINESS 1. Public Hearing: Case V-22-001 Tynesha Breedlove; Requesting a Variance to Section 35- 226. MINIMUM YARD DIMENSIONS. (A.) Front Setbacks (Haymore) Mrs. Ragsdale, Director of Community Development, reported th at Tynesha Breedlove, was requesting a Variance to Section 35-226. Minimum Yard Dimensions. (A) Front Setback, of the Pittsylvania County Zoning Ordinance, shown on the records as GPIN # 2309-11-4940, located on State Road 1555/Fox Trail Road. Ms. Breedlove is requesting a variance of eleven (11) feet from the required thirty-five (35) foot front setback. A motion was made by Mr. Dalton, seconded by Mr. Waters to recommend approval of the variance. Motion passed by a seven (7) to zero (0) vote. RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Darrell Dalton, Board of Supervisors Rep SECONDER: Richard Waters, Member - Chatham-Blairs District AYES: Haymore, Harker, Mease, Horne, Oakes, Waters, Dalton ABSENT: Henderson Mrs. Ragsdale stated there will be 5 rezoning cases and 6 Special Use Permits for the July Meeting. She also stated that the Board of Supervisors would adopt a resolution at the June 21, 2022, meeting for Nathan Harker, who was recognized at the VFA Conference in Blacksburg as logger of the year and Emiliee Harker who received Liberty University's President's Award for Excellence in Teaching. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:48 p.m. 7.1.a Packet Pg. 10 Attachment: 06_07_2022 PC Minutes -packet (3252 : PC Minutes 06_07_2022) Planning Commission STAFF SUMMARY Case: Public Hearing: Case R- 22-020 Lisa Wilkinson District: Dan River Election District Zoning Request: R-1 to A-1 Agenda Date: July 05, 2022 Meeting History: SUBJECT Requested by Lisa Wilkinson, to rezone property located on State Road 968/Sandy Creek Church Road, in the Dan River Election District and shown on the Tax Maps as part of GPIN # 2357-86- 7262. The applicants are requesting to rezone 0.617 acres, from R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District, to A-1, Agricultural District, to allow the property to be consolidated with adjacent property zoned A-1. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Lisa Wilkinson is requesting to rezone 0.617 acres from R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District, to A-1, Agricultural District, so that property lines may be adjusted. If rezoned, the property will be consolidated with an adjacent parcel currently zoned A-1, Agricultural District. All properties must share the same zoning classification to be consolidated, requiring the subject property to be rezoned prior to consolidation. A plat titled Lisa Renee Wilkinson & Rhonda W. Day has been submitted with the application to identify the area where zoning changes are necessary and to present the proposed property line adjustments. Once the properties are rezoned to A-1, all uses listed under Section 35-178 are a permitted use. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION The Comprehensive Plan designates the future land use as Agricultural and Rural Residential. ZONING AND CURRENT USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES Adjacent to A-1, Agricultural District, and R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District, properties. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends APPROVAL of Case R-22-020, submitted by Lisa Wilkinson, requesting to rezone 0.617 acres located on State Road 968/Sandy Creek Church Road, in the Dan River 9.1 Packet Pg. 11 Election District and shown on the Tax Map as GPIN# 2357-86-7262 to allow the property to be consolidated with an adjacent property zoned A-1. The subject property is adjacent to properties currently zoned A-1, Agricultural District and the rezoning would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. PLANNING COMMISSION OPTIONS: 1. Recommend approval of Case R-22-020 as submitted. 2. Recommend denial of Case R-22-020 as submitted. ATTACHMENTS: A. Application B. Maps C. Letter of Intent D. Executive Summary E. Petition F. Sign Affidavit G. Adjacent Parcel Owners 9.1 Packet Pg. 12 9.1.a Packet Pg. 13 Attachment: R-22-020 Lisa Wilkinson App (3244 : Public Hearing: Case R-22-020 Lisa Wilkinson) 9.1.a Packet Pg. 14 Attachment: R-22-020 Lisa Wilkinson App (3244 : Public Hearing: Case R-22-020 Lisa Wilkinson) 9.1.a Packet Pg. 15 Attachment: R-22-020 Lisa Wilkinson App (3244 : Public Hearing: Case R-22-020 Lisa Wilkinson) 9.1.a Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: R-22-020 Lisa Wilkinson App (3244 : Public Hearing: Case R-22-020 Lisa Wilkinson) 9.1.a Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: R-22-020 Lisa Wilkinson App (3244 : Public Hearing: Case R-22-020 Lisa Wilkinson) 9.1.a Packet Pg. 18 Attachment: R-22-020 Lisa Wilkinson App (3244 : Public Hearing: Case R-22-020 Lisa Wilkinson) 9.1.a Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: R-22-020 Lisa Wilkinson App (3244 : Public Hearing: Case R-22-020 Lisa Wilkinson) 9.1.b Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: R-22-020 Lisa Wilkinson Map (3244 : Public Hearing: Case R-22-020 Lisa Wilkinson) 9.1.c Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: R-22-020 Lisa Wilkinson Plat (3244 : Public Hearing: Case R-22-020 Lisa Wilkinson) Planning Commission STAFF SUMMARY Case: Public Hearing: Case R- 22-022 Donnie Devall, Jr. District: Westover District Election District Zoning Request: R-1 to A-1 Agenda Date: July 05, 2022 Meeting History: SUBJECT Requested by Donnie Devall, Jr., to rezone property located on State Road 870/Vandola Road, in the Westover Election District and shown on the Tax Maps as GPIN #s 1386-71-5326 and 1386- 71-6471. The applicant is requesting to rezone a total of 4.6 acres, from R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District, to A-1, Agricultural District, to allow the properties to be consolidated with an adjacent property zoned A-1. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Donnie Devall, Jr is requesting to rezone 4.6 acres from R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District, to A-1, Agricultural District, so that property lines may be adjusted. If rezoned, the property will be consolidated with an adjacent parcel currently zoned A-1, Agricultural District. All properties must share the same zoning classification to be consolidated, requiring the subject property to be rezoned prior to consolidation. A new plat has not been submitted but if the rezoning is approved, a new plat must be submitted and approved by the Community Development Department prior to being recorded. Once the properties are rezoned to A-1, all uses listed under Section 35-178 are a permitted use. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION The Comprehensive Plan designates the future land use as Medium to High Density Residential. ZONING AND CURRENT USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES Adjacent to A-1, Agricultural District, zoned properties. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends APPROVAL of Case R-22-022, submitted by Donnie Devall, Jr requesting to rezone 4.6 acres located on State Road 870/Vandola Road, in the Westover Election District and shown on the Tax Map as GPIN#s 1386-71-6471 & 1386-71-5326 to allow property lines to be 9.2 Packet Pg. 22 adjusted. The subject properties are adjacent to properties currently zoned A-1, Agricultural District. PLANNING COMMISSION OPTIONS: 1. Recommend approval of Case R-22-022 as submitted. 2. Recommend denial of Case R-22-022 as submitted. ATTACHMENTS: A. Application B. Maps C. Letter of Intent D. Executive Summary E. Petition F. Sign Affidavit G. Adjacent Parcel Owners 9.2 Packet Pg. 23 9.2.a Packet Pg. 24 Attachment: R-22-022 Donnie Devall App (3245 : Public Hearing: Case R-22-022 Donnie Devall, Jr.) 9.2.a Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: R-22-022 Donnie Devall App (3245 : Public Hearing: Case R-22-022 Donnie Devall, Jr.) 9.2.a Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: R-22-022 Donnie Devall App (3245 : Public Hearing: Case R-22-022 Donnie Devall, Jr.) 9.2.a Packet Pg. 27 Attachment: R-22-022 Donnie Devall App (3245 : Public Hearing: Case R-22-022 Donnie Devall, Jr.) 9.2.a Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: R-22-022 Donnie Devall App (3245 : Public Hearing: Case R-22-022 Donnie Devall, Jr.) 9.2.a Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: R-22-022 Donnie Devall App (3245 : Public Hearing: Case R-22-022 Donnie Devall, Jr.) 9.2.a Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: R-22-022 Donnie Devall App (3245 : Public Hearing: Case R-22-022 Donnie Devall, Jr.) 9.2.b Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: R-22-022 Donnie Devall Map (3245 : Public Hearing: Case R-22-022 Donnie Devall, Jr.) Planning Commission STAFF SUMMARY Case: Public Hearing: Case R- 22-024 William and Kristy Astin District: Dan River Election District Zoning Request: R-1 to A-1 Agenda Date: July 05, 2022 Meeting History: SUBJECT Requested by William and Kristy Astin, to rezone property located on State Road 989/Airport Road, in the Dan River Election District and shown on the Tax Maps as GPIN #s 2336-52-4576, 2336-52-7352, and 2336-52-7571. The applicants are requesting to rezone a total of 3.65 acres, from R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District, to A-1, Agricultural District, to allow for future consolidation with an adjacent property zoned A-1. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION William and Kristy Astin are requesting to rezone a total of 3.65 acres from R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District, to A-1, Agricultural District, to prepare for future consolidation of the subject property with adjacent property they own zoned A-1. If rezoned, the property will be consolidated with adjacent parcels currently zoned A-1, Agricultural District, in the future. All properties must share the same zoning classification to be consolidated, requiring the subject property to be rezoned prior to consolidation. A new plat has not been submitted but if the rezoning is approved, a new plat must be submitted and approved by the Community Development Department prior to being recorded. Once the properties are rezoned to A-1, all uses listed under Section 35-178 are a permitted use. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION The Comprehensive Plan designates the future land use as Medium to High Density Residential. ZONING AND CURRENT USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES Adjacent to A-1, Agricultural District, and R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District, properties. RECOMMENDATION 9.3 Packet Pg. 32 Staff recommends APPROVAL of Case R-22-024, submitted by William & Kristy Astin, requesting to rezone a total of 3.65 acres located on State Road 989/Airport Road, in the Dan River Election District and shown on the Tax Map as GPIN#s 2336-52-4576, 2336-52-7352 & 2336-52-7571 to allow the properties to be combined with adjacent property zoned A-1. The subject properties are adjacent to properties currently zoned A-1, Agricultural District. PLANNING COMMISSION OPTIONS: 1. Recommend approval of Case R-22-024 as submitted. 2. Recommend denial of Case R-22-024 as submitted. ATTACHMENTS: A. Application B. Maps C. Letter of Intent D. Executive Summary E. Petition F. Sign Affidavit G. Adjacent Parcel Owners 9.3 Packet Pg. 33 9.3.a Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: R-22-024 William Astin App (3246 : Public Hearing: Case R-22-024 William and Kristy Astin) 9.3.a Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: R-22-024 William Astin App (3246 : Public Hearing: Case R-22-024 William and Kristy Astin) 9.3.a Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: R-22-024 William Astin App (3246 : Public Hearing: Case R-22-024 William and Kristy Astin) 9.3.a Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: R-22-024 William Astin App (3246 : Public Hearing: Case R-22-024 William and Kristy Astin) 9.3.a Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: R-22-024 William Astin App (3246 : Public Hearing: Case R-22-024 William and Kristy Astin) 9.3.a Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: R-22-024 William Astin App (3246 : Public Hearing: Case R-22-024 William and Kristy Astin) 9.3.a Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: R-22-024 William Astin App (3246 : Public Hearing: Case R-22-024 William and Kristy Astin) 9.3.b Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: R-22-024 William Astin Map (3246 : Public Hearing: Case R-22-024 William and Kristy Astin) Planning Commission STAFF SUMMARY Case: Public Hearing: Case R- 22-025 Charles Turner and Michael Turner District: Tunstall District Election District Zoning Request: R-1 to A-1 Agenda Date: July 05, 2022 Meeting History: SUBJECT Requested by Charles Turner and Michael Turner, to rezone property located on State Road 851/Sugartree Church Road, in the Tunstall Election District and shown on the Tax Maps as GPIN #1460-61-9629. The applicants are requesting to rezone a total of 1.0 acre, from R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District, to A-1, Agricultural District, to allow the property to be consolidated with an adjacent property zoned A-1. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Charles Turner & Michael Turner are requesting to rezone 1.0 acre from R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District, to A-1, Agricultural District, so that property lines may be adjusted. If rezoned, the property will be consolidated with an adjacent parcel currently zoned A-1, Agricultural District. All properties must share the same zoning classification to be consolidated, requiring the subject property to be rezoned prior to consolidation. A plat titled Charles W. Turner & Michael W. Turner has been submitted with the application to identify the area where zoning changes are necessary and to present the proposed property line adjustments. Once the properties are rezoned to A-1, all uses listed under Section 35-178 are a permitted use. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION The Comprehensive Plan designates the future land use as Agricultural. ZONING AND CURRENT USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES Adjacent to A-1, Agricultural District, and R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District, properties. RECOMMENDATION 9.4 Packet Pg. 42 Staff recommends APPROVAL of Case R-22-025, submitted by Charles Turner & Michael Turner, requesting to rezone 1.0 acre located on State Road 851/Sugartree Church Road, in the Tunstall Election District and shown on the Tax Map as GPIN# 1460-61-9629 to allow the property to be consolidated with an adjacent property zoned A-1. The subject property is adjacent to properties currently zoned A-1, Agricultural District and the rezoning would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. PLANNING COMMISSION OPTIONS: 1. Recommend approval of Case R-22-025 as submitted. 2. Recommend denial of Case R-22-025 as submitted. ATTACHMENTS: A. Application B. Maps C. Letter of Intent D. Executive Summary E. Petition F. Sign Affidavit G. Adjacent Parcel Owners 9.4 Packet Pg. 43 9.4.a Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: R-22-025 Charles Turner App (3247 : Public Hearing: Case R-22-025 Charles Turner and Michael Turner) 9.4.a Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: R-22-025 Charles Turner App (3247 : Public Hearing: Case R-22-025 Charles Turner and Michael Turner) 9.4.a Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: R-22-025 Charles Turner App (3247 : Public Hearing: Case R-22-025 Charles Turner and Michael Turner) 9.4.a Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: R-22-025 Charles Turner App (3247 : Public Hearing: Case R-22-025 Charles Turner and Michael Turner) 9.4.a Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: R-22-025 Charles Turner App (3247 : Public Hearing: Case R-22-025 Charles Turner and Michael Turner) 9.4.a Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: R-22-025 Charles Turner App (3247 : Public Hearing: Case R-22-025 Charles Turner and Michael Turner) 9.4.a Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: R-22-025 Charles Turner App (3247 : Public Hearing: Case R-22-025 Charles Turner and Michael Turner) 9.4.b Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: R-22-025 Charles Turner Map (3247 : Public Hearing: Case R-22-025 Charles Turner and Michael Turner) 9.4.c Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: R-22-025 Charles Turner Plat (3247 : Public Hearing: Case R-22-025 Charles Turner and Michael Turner) Planning Commission STAFF SUMMARY Case: Public Hearing: Case S- 22-014 Joshua and Amy Jennings District: Tunstall District Election District Zoning Request: SUP Agenda Date: July 05, 2022 Meeting History: SUBJECT Requested by Joshua and Amy Jennings, for a Special Use Permit for an indoor gun range in accordance with Pittsylvania County Code § 35-179. The property is a total of 9.83 acres, located on State Road 58/Martinsville Highway, in the Tunstall Election District and shown on the Tax Maps as GPIN #s 1339-95-4594 and 1339-95-4137. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Joshua and Amy Jennings are requesting a Special Use Permit to operate an Indoor Gun Range on the subject properties in accordance with Pittsylvania County Code § 35-179. The properties are currently vacant. On April 19, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved a rezoning application, with no opposition, to change the properties’ zoning designation to A-1, Agricultural District, to allow for an indoor gun range as a use permitted by Special Use Permit. The applicants are proposing to construct a 9,600 square foot building on the subject properties, containing 4-6 shooting lanes. The applicants have stated that the lanes will be constructed to all Department of Energy requirements and industry standards to accommodate up to .30 caliber rifles. An informational sheet is included in the packet providing additional information on ventilation, sound reduction methods, target retrieval, and proposed hours of operation. A site plan is also included in the packet. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION The Comprehensive Plan designates the future land use as Agricultural and Rural Residential. ZONING OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES Mostly surrounded by properties zoned RC-1, Residential Combined Subdivision District, and A-1, Agricultural District. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Included in the packet. RECOMMENDATION 9.5 Packet Pg. 53 Staff recommends APPROVAL of Case S-22-014 with the following conditions: 1. All shooting lanes must be contained within an enclosed structure. 2. Lanes must be constructed to contain bullets within its walls, ceiling, and floor and must be properly vented. 3. The facility must meet Department of Energy standards and Uniform Statewide Building Code requirements where applicable. PLANNING COMMISSION MOTIONS: 1. Recommend approval of Case S-22-014 as submitted. 2. Recommend denial of Case S-22-014 as submitted. ATTACHMENTS: A. Application B. Maps C. Letter of Intent D. Executive Summary E. Petition F. Sign Affidavit G. Adjacent Parcel Owners 9.5 Packet Pg. 54 9.5.a Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: S-22-014 Jennings App (3251 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-014 Joshua and Amy Jennings) 9.5.a Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: S-22-014 Jennings App (3251 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-014 Joshua and Amy Jennings) 9.5.a Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: S-22-014 Jennings App (3251 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-014 Joshua and Amy Jennings) 9.5.a Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: S-22-014 Jennings App (3251 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-014 Joshua and Amy Jennings) 9.5.a Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: S-22-014 Jennings App (3251 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-014 Joshua and Amy Jennings) 9.5.a Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: S-22-014 Jennings App (3251 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-014 Joshua and Amy Jennings) 9.5.a Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: S-22-014 Jennings App (3251 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-014 Joshua and Amy Jennings) 9.5.b Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: S-22-014 Joshua Jennings Map (3251 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-014 Joshua and Amy Jennings) 9.5.c Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: Case S-22-014 Jennings Info (3251 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-014 Joshua and Amy Jennings) 9.5.dPacket Pg. 64Attachment: S-22-014 Jennings Site Plan (3251 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-014 Joshua and Amy Jennings) 9.5.dPacket Pg. 65Attachment: S-22-014 Jennings Site Plan (3251 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-014 Joshua and Amy Jennings) Planning Commission STAFF SUMMARY Case: Public Hearing: Case S- 22-015 Bradley Boswell District: Callands-Gretna Election District Zoning Request: SUP Agenda Date: July 05, 2022 Meeting History: SUBJECT Requested by Bradley Boswell, for a Special Use Permit for the placement of a double-wide mobile home in accordance with Pittsylvania County Code § 35-223. The property is 1.0 acre, located on Hwy 40/E Gretna Road in the Callands-Gretna Election District and shown on the Tap Maps as GPIN # 2550-81-0113. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Bradley Boswell is requesting a Special Use Permit to allow for the placement of a double-wide mobile home on the property to be used as a personal residence. PCC § 35-223 requires a Special Use Permit for mobile homes under the R-1 zoning classification. The property is currently vacant. There are other single-wide mobile homes and double-wide mobile homes in the general area. If a Special Use Permit is granted, all applicable setback requirements and Building Code regulations would have to be met before the mobile home could be placed on the property. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION The Comprehensive Plan designates the future land use as Agricultural and Rural Residential. ZONING OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES Mostly surrounded by A-1, Agricultural District, RC-1, Residential Combined Subdivision District, and R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District zoned properties SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN N/A RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends APPROVAL of Case S-22-015 as submitted. PLANNING COMMISSION MOTIONS: 1. Recommend approval of Case S-22-015 as submitted. 2. Recommend approval of Case S-22-015 subject to conditions by the Planning Commission. 3. Recommend denial of Case S-22-015 as submitted. 9.6 Packet Pg. 66 ATTACHMENTS: A. Application B. Maps C. Letter of Intent D. Executive Summary E. Petition F. Sign Affidavit G. Adjacent Parcel Owners 9.6 Packet Pg. 67 9.6.a Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: S-22-015 Bradley Boswell App (3248 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-015 Bradley Boswell) 9.6.a Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: S-22-015 Bradley Boswell App (3248 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-015 Bradley Boswell) 9.6.a Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: S-22-015 Bradley Boswell App (3248 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-015 Bradley Boswell) 9.6.a Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: S-22-015 Bradley Boswell App (3248 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-015 Bradley Boswell) 9.6.a Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: S-22-015 Bradley Boswell App (3248 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-015 Bradley Boswell) 9.6.a Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: S-22-015 Bradley Boswell App (3248 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-015 Bradley Boswell) 9.6.a Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: S-22-015 Bradley Boswell App (3248 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-015 Bradley Boswell) 9.6.b Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: S-22-015 Bradley Boswell Map (3248 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-015 Bradley Boswell) Planning Commission STAFF SUMMARY Case: Public Hearing: Case S- 22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC District: Banister Election District Zoning Request: SUP Agenda Date: July 05, 2022 Meeting History: SUBJECT Requested by Pittsylvania CSG LLC, for a Special Use Permit for a Utility Scale Solar Energy Facility. The property 52.01 acres, located on State Road 724/Mill Creek Road, in the Banister District and shown on the Tap Map as GPIN # 2427-12-7949. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Pittsylvania CSG LLC is requesting a Special Use Permit to operate a Utility Scale Solar Energy facility on 52.01 acres, located on State Road 637/Mill Creek Road in the Banister Election District. The total project will be a 5-megawatt (MW) alternating current (AC) Utility Scale Solar Energy Facility, connecting to the Dominion Energy grid through an interconnection to the existing transmission line. This project is classified as a Community Solar project under Virginia State Code, however, the Pittsylvania County Zoning Ordinance defines any “energy conversation system, whose primary purpose is to produce power for consumption by, or under contract to, a utility provider, consisting of photovoltaic panels, support structures, and associated control, conversion, and transmission hardware which has a total site area of more than five (5) acres” as a Utility Scale Solar Energy Facility. This project meets that definition. The Pittsylvania County Zoning Ordinance requires a site plan, viewshed protection plan and landscape plan to be submitted and approved prior to permits being issued to ensure compliance with setback and vegetative screening requirements and protection of the viewshed during construction. The applicant will also be required to submit an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and Stormwater Plan to the Community Development Department and the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality to ensure that all stormwater and erosion and sediment control regulations are being met. Once the plans are approved, the appropriate bonds will be required before land disturbance permits will be issued. A decommissioning plan is required to be submitted and a bond secured to ensure compliance with the plan at the end of the project’s life as well. All required plans must be approved before any construction permits will be issued. RELATIONSHIP TO THE SURROUNDING LAND USE AND NEIGHBORING AREAS 9.7 Packet Pg. 76 Mostly surrounded by agricultural and residential uses. ZONING OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES Mostly surrounded by A-1, Agricultural District and R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District zoned properties. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN The Site Development Plan is included in the packet. The applicant will be required to submit a site plan, construction plans, an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, a Stormwater Plan, and once approved, submit the appropriate bonds and a decommissioning bond. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends APPROVAL of the request with the following conditions: 1. Site Development Plan; Location. All solar panels and other above-ground equipment will be located within the “Project Area” shown on the Conceptual Site Plan included with the SUP application. All Site Plan requirements of Section 35-141 must be met before permits are issued. 2. Height. Except for the collection yard and substation or otherwise as required by applicable building code, the maximum height of the solar panels and other above-ground equipment will be 15 feet. 3. Setbacks. Except for fencing and any pole mounted electronic lines, consistent with the County ordinance, all above-ground equipment shall meet the setback requirements set forth in Section 35-141 (D). No setbacks are required between the parcels lines of parcels that are part of a single Project. No setbacks are required between the parcels lines of parcels that are part of a single Project. 4. Fencing. Fencing for the Project will be standard chain-link and at least 6 feet high. The Applicant shall maintain the fence for the life of the Project. 5. Landscaping. Applicant will comply with Section 35-121 Fencing – Screening. At the perimeter locations, the setback will include a minimum 100-foot-wide landscaped area comprised of any existing vegetation supplemented as needed with a staggered row of planted trees and large shrubs. All rows of planted vegetation shall be evergreen plantings of varieties native or adaptable to the region, with one (1) row consisting of a variety expected to reach a minimum height of twenty-five (25) feet and the remaining rows of varieties designed to reach at least fifteen (15) feet in height at maturity. All evergreens shall be a minimum of six (6) feet in height at time of planting. Existing vegetation shall be maintained and supplemented with new plantings as needed to maintain required screening. Prior to construction and site plan approval, a landscaping maintenance plan will be submitted to the Zoning Administrator for approval, which shall provide for the posting of a bond or other surety in an amount sufficient to ensure that the plantings are successfully established, and the landscaping is maintained or replaced during the life of the Project. Landscape renderings or simulations shall be sealed by a registered landscape architect. 6. Construction Management and Mitigation. Prior to construction, the Applicant shall prepare and submit to the Zoning Administrator a construction management plan to 9.7 Packet Pg. 77 address traffic control methods, site access, fencing, lighting, mitigation of construction operations, and hours of construction activity. 7. Viewshed Protection. A Viewshed Protection Plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to the issuance of permits, identifying appropriate measures that will be taken to protect the viewshed surrounding the project during construction. 8. Road Repairs. All public and private roads must remain open during construction. Any damage to roads caused by construction will be promptly repaired to preconstruction conditions and/or VDOT standards where deemed necessary. 9. Erosion and Sediment Control. Prior to construction, an approved erosion and sediment control plan will be implemented for the entire Project, and an erosion and sediment control bond will be provided. 10. Stormwater Management. Prior to construction, a Virginia Stormwater Management Program Permit from the Virginia DEQ will be obtained for the Project, including an approved Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. 11. Operational Noise and Electrical Interference. The Project will comply with all applicable County requirements for noise and shall not generate or create electrical interruptions or interference with existing electrical or electronic uses. 12. Operational Light. Fixed lighting at the perimeter of the Project will be limited to gates and will be shielded/downward facing to minimize light spillage and shall be motion- activated. 13. Compliance. The project shall be designed, constructed, and tested to meet all applicable local, state, and federal standards. 14. Decommissioning. In accordance with Section 35-141(E), the applicant shall completely decommission the facility within 12 months, if the facility ceases to generate electricity for a continuous period of 12 months, including all solar collectors, cabling, electrical components, fencing and any other associated equipment, facilities, and structures. Prior to construction and approval of the entire site plan, a decommissioning plan will be submitted to the Zoning Administrator, which shall provide for the posting of a bond or other surety acceptable to the County in the amount of the decommissioning costs, not including salvage value, for the Project. 15. Start of construction. The SUP will expire unless construction of the entire Project is commenced within 3 years of the date of issuance of the SUP. 16. Survival. So long as the Project is operated in conformance with these conditions, the SUP shall continue for the life of the Project. 17. Comply with all DEQ regulations regarding nonpoint source pollutants. Chemical sprays used in weed control shall comply with DEQ regulations. 18. Fire and Rescue Training. The applicant shall provide annual training to the local fire department regarding battery storage. 19. Ordinance Compliance. The project shall remain in compliance with all other applicable requirements of the Pittsylvania County Code § 35-141(D), § 35-141(E), and § 35-141(F) not specifically stated in the conditions of this Special Use Permit. 9.7 Packet Pg. 78 PLANNING COMMISSION MOTIONS: 1. Recommend approval of Case S-22-016 as submitted. 2. Recommend approval of Case S-22-016 subject to conditions by staff. 3. Recommend approval of Case S-22-016 subject to conditions by the Planning Commission. 4. Recommend denial of Case S-22-016 as submitted. ATTACHMENTS: A. Application B. Letter of Intent C. Executive Summary D. Petition E. Sign Affidavit F. Adjacent Parcel Owners G. Special Power of Attorney H. Conceptual Plan 9.7 Packet Pg. 79 9.7.a Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 81 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 85 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 86 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 87 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 88 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 89 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 90 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 97 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 98 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 99 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.a Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis App (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) 9.7.b Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: S-22-016 Jane Ellis Map (3249 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-016 Pittsylvania CSG LLC) Planning Commission STAFF SUMMARY Case: Public Hearing: Case S- 22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC District: Chatham-Blairs Election District Zoning Request: SUP Agenda Date: July 05, 2022 Meeting History: SUBJECT Requested by Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC for a Special Use Permit for a Utility Scale Solar Energy Facility. The property is 47.36 acres, located on U.S. Highway 29, in the Chatham-Blairs Election District and shown on the Tap Map as GPIN # 2424-30-7366. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC, is requesting a Special Use Permit to operate a utility scale solar energy facility on 47.36 acres, located on Hwy 29/12020US Highway 29 in the Chatham-Blairs Election District. The project will be a 3-megawatt (MW) alternating current (AC) utility scale solar energy facility, connecting to the Dominion Power grid through an interconnection to the existing transmission line. The Pittsylvania County Zoning Ordinance requires a site plan, viewshed protection plan and landscape plan to be submitted and approved prior to permits being issued to ensure compliance with setback and vegetative screening requirements and protection of the viewshed during construction. The applicant will also be required to submit an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and Stormwater Plan to the Community Development Department and the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality to ensure that all stormwater and erosion and sediment control regulations are being met. Once the plans are approved, the appropriate bonds will be required before land disturbance permits will be issued. A decommissioning plan is required to be submitted and a bond secured to ensure compliance with the plan at the end of the project’s life as well. All required plans must be approved before any construction permits will be issued. RELATIONSHIP TO THE SURROUNDING LAND USE AND NEIGHBORING AREAS Mostly surrounded by agricultural and residential uses. ZONING OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES Mostly surrounded by A-1, Agricultural District, M-2, Industrial District, Heavy Industry, and B- 2, Business District, General, zoned properties. 9.8 Packet Pg. 142 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN The Site Development Plan is included in the packet. The applicant will be required to submit a site plan, construction plans, an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, a Stormwater Plan, and once approved, submit the appropriate bonds and a decommissioning bond. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends APPROVAL of the request with the following conditions: 1. Site Development Plan; Location. All solar panels and other above-ground equipment will be located within the “Project Area” shown on the Conceptual Site Plan included with the SUP application. All Site Plan requirements of Section 35-141 must be met before permits are issued. 2. Height. Except for the collection yard and substation or otherwise as required by applicable building code, the maximum height of the solar panels and other above-ground equipment will be 15 feet. 3. Setbacks. Except for fencing and any pole mounted electronic lines, consistent with the County ordinance, all above-ground equipment shall meet the setback requirements set forth in Section 35-141 (D). No setbacks are required between the parcels lines of parcels that are part of a single Project. No setbacks are required between the parcels lines of parcels that are part of a single Project. 4. Fencing. Fencing for the Project will be standard chain-link and at least 6 feet high. The Applicant shall maintain the fence for the life of the Project. 5. Landscaping. Applicant will comply with Section 35-121 Fencing – Screening. At the perimeter locations, the setback will include a minimum 100-foot-wide landscaped area comprised of any existing vegetation supplemented as needed with a staggered row of planted trees and large shrubs. All rows of planted vegetation shall be evergreen plantings of varieties native or adaptable to the region, with one (1) row consisting of a variety expected to reach a minimum height of twenty-five (25) feet and the remaining rows of varieties designed to reach at least fifteen (15) feet in height at maturity. All evergreens shall be a minimum of six (6) feet in height at time of planting. Existing vegetation shall be maintained and supplemented with new plantings as needed to maintain required screening. Prior to construction and site plan approval, a landscaping maintenance plan will be submitted to the Zoning Administrator for approval, which shall provide for the posting of a bond or other surety in an amount sufficient to ensure that the plantings are successfully established, and the landscaping is maintained or replaced during the life of the Project. Landscape renderings or simulations shall be sealed by a registered landscape architect. 6. Construction Management and Mitigation. Prior to construction, the Applicant shall prepare and submit to the Zoning Administrator a construction management plan to address traffic control methods, site access, fencing, lighting, mitigation of construction operations, and hours of construction activity. 7. Viewshed Protection. A Viewshed Protection Plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to the issuance of permits, identifying 9.8 Packet Pg. 143 appropriate measures that will be taken to protect the viewshed surrounding the project during construction. 8. Road Repairs. All public and private roads must remain open during construction. Any damage to roads caused by construction will be promptly repaired to preconstruction conditions and/or VDOT standards where deemed necessary. 9. Erosion and Sediment Control. Prior to construction, an approved erosion and sediment control plan will be implemented for the entire Project, and an erosion and sediment control bond will be provided. 10. Stormwater Management. Prior to construction, a Virginia Stormwater Management Program Permit from the Virginia DEQ will be obtained for the Project, including an approved Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. 11. Operational Noise and Electrical Interference. The Project will comply with all applicable County requirements for noise and shall not generate or create electrical interruptions or interference with existing electrical or electronic uses. 12. Operational Light. Fixed lighting at the perimeter of the Project will be limited to gates and will be shielded/downward facing to minimize light spillage and shall be motion- activated. 13. Compliance. The project shall be designed, constructed, and tested to meet all applicable local, state, and federal standards. 14. Decommissioning. In accordance with Section 35-141(E), the applicant shall completely decommission the facility within 12 months, if the facility ceases to generate electricity for a continuous period of 12 months, including all solar collectors, cabling, electrical components, fencing and any other associated equipment, facilities, and structures. Prior to construction and approval of the entire site plan, a decommissioning plan will be submitted to the Zoning Administrator, which shall provide for the posting of a bond or other surety acceptable to the County in the amount of the decommissioning costs, not including salvage value, for the Project. 15. Start of construction. The SUP will expire unless construction of the entire Project is commenced within 3 years of the date of issuance of the SUP. 16. Survival. So long as the Project is operated in conformance with these conditions, the SUP shall continue for the life of the Project. 17. Comply with all DEQ regulations regarding nonpoint source pollutants. Chemical sprays used in weed control shall comply with DEQ regulations. 18. Fire and Rescue Training. The applicant shall provide annual training to the local fire department regarding battery storage. 19. Ordinance Compliance. The project shall remain in compliance with all other applicable requirements of the Pittsylvania County Code § 35-141(D), § 35-141(E), and § 35-141(F) not specifically stated in the conditions of this Special Use Permit. PLANNING COMMISSION MOTIONS: 1. Recommend approval of Case S-22-017 as submitted. 2. Recommend approval of Case S-22-017 subject to conditions by staff. 3. Recommend approval of Case S-22-017 subject to conditions by the Planning Commission. 9.8 Packet Pg. 144 4. Recommend denial of Case S-22-017 as submitted. ATTACHMENTS: A. Application B. Letter of Intent C. Executive Summary D. Petition E. Sign Affidavit F. Adjacent Parcel Owners G. Special Power of Attorney H. Conceptual Plan 9.8 Packet Pg. 145 9.8.a Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.a Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar App (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.b Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Map (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.cPacket Pg. 267Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Site Plan (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.cPacket Pg. 268Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Site Plan (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.cPacket Pg. 269Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Site Plan (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.cPacket Pg. 270Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Site Plan (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.cPacket Pg. 271Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Site Plan (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.cPacket Pg. 272Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Site Plan (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC) 9.8.cPacket Pg. 273Attachment: S-22-017 Dry Fork Site Plan (3250 : Public Hearing: Case S-22-017 Dry Fork Solar 1, LLC)