Loading...
PC 04 06 2021 PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING Tuesday, April 6, 2021 – 7:00 PM Board Meeting Room 39 Bank Street, SE, Chatham, Virginia 24531 AGENDA I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. HEARING OF CITIZENS Each person addressing the Board under Hearing of the Citizens shall be a resident or land owner of the County, or the registered agent of such resident or land owner. Each person shall step up, give his/her name and district in an audible tone of voice for the record, and unless further time is granted by the Chairman, shall limit his/her address to three (3) minutes. No person shall be permitted to address the Board more than once during Hearing of the Citizens. All remarks shall be addressed to the Board as a body and not to any individual member thereof. Hearing of the Citizens shall last for a maximum of forty-five (45) minutes. Any individual that is signed up to speak during said section who does not get the opportunity to do so because of the aforementioned time limit, shall be given speaking priority at the next Board meeting. Absent Chairman’s approval, no person shall be able to speak who has not signed up. IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 1. Motion to Approve Agenda V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes 03-02-2021 VI. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT VII. PUBLIC HEARING Pursuant to Article V, Division 7 of the Pittsylvania County Zoning Ordinance, we the Planning Commission have been empowered to hear and decide specific applications in support of said ordinance and to make recommendations to the Board of Supervisors or Regular Meeting - April 6, 2021 the Board of Zoning Appeals. In accomplishing this important task, we are charged with promoting the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Pittsylvania County. We must insure that all our decisions and recommendations be directed to these goals and that each be consistent with the environment, the comprehensive plan and in the best interest of Pittsylvania County, its citizens and its posterity. Anyone here to speak to the board regarding zoning cases will be limited to (3) three minutes. Case Case R-21-007 Cornerstone Church of Christ: Case R-21-007 Cornerstone Church of Christ; Rezoning from R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District, to A-1, Agricultural District (Henderson) Case Case R-21-008 Gregory & Janie Robinson: Case R-21-008 Gregory & Janie Robinson; Rezoning from A-1, Agricultural District, and R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District, to A-1, Agricultural District (Mease) Case Case R-21-009 Haile Gatewood, Jr.: Case R-21-009 Haile Gatewood, Jr.; Rezoning from R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District, to A-1, Agricultural District (Haymore) Case Case R-21-010 Mark Redd: Case R-21-010 Mark Redd; Rezoning from A-1, Agricultural District, to R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District (Henderson) Case Case R-21-011 Jeremy & Julia Watson: Case R-21-011 Jeremy & Julia Watson; Rezoning from RC-1, Residential Combined Subdivision District, to A-1, Agricultural District (Harker) Case Case R-21-012 Gentry Farms, LLC: Case R-21-012 Gentry Farms, LLC; Rezoning from R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District, to A-1, Agricultural District (Horne) Case Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC: Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC; Special Use Permit for a Utility Scale Solar Energy Facility (Mease) Case Case S-21-003 The Dock at SML, LLC: Case S-21-003 The Dock at SML, LLC; Special Use Permit for a Marina (Mease) VIII. OLD BUSINESS IX. NEW BUSINESS X. ADJOURNMENT XI. PLANNING/ZONING ITEMS Planning Commission STAFF SUMMARY Case: District: Zoning Request: Agenda Date: April 06, 2021 Meeting History: 5.1 Packet Pg. 3 March 2, 2021 Regular Meeting Pittsylvania County Planning Commission Regular Meeting March 2, 2021 VIRGINIA: The Regular Meeting of the Pittsylvania County Planning Commission was held on March 2, 2021 in the Board Meeting Room, 39 Bank Street, SE, Chatham, Virginia. Chairman - Westover District H.F. Haymore, called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. The following members were present: Attendee Name Title Status Arrived H.F. Haymore Chairman - Westover District Present 6:17 PM Nathan Harker Vice Chairman - Staunton River District Present 6:18 PM Colette Henderson Member - Banister District Present 6:18 PM Janet Mease Member - Callands-Gretna District Present 6:18 PM Brian K. Horne Member - Dan River District Present 6:18 PM Morris Stowe Member - Tunstall District Present 6:17 PM Richard Waters Member - Chatham-Blairs District Present 6:18 PM Timothy W. Dudley Board of Supervisors Rep Absent PLEDGE OF ALLEGIENCE The Board recited the Pledge of Allegiance. HEARING OF CITIZENS No citizens came forward to speak. APPROVAL OF AGENDA A motion was made by Mr. Harker seconded by Mrs. Mease, and by a 7 to 0 vote the agenda was approved as presented, (one (1) member, Mr. Dudley was absent). RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Nathan Harker, Vice Chairman - Staunton River District SECONDER: Janet Mease, Member - Callands-Gretna District AYES: Haymore, Harker, Henderson, Mease, Horne, Stowe, Waters ABSENT: Dudley APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes were amended, showing Mr. Harker was not nominated by Mr. Horne as stated. A motion was made by Mr. Horne, seconded by Mrs. Mease, and by a 7 to 0 vote the minutes was approved as amended, (one (1) member, Mr. Dudley was absent). 1. Minutes from February 2, 2021 5.1.a Packet Pg. 4 Attachment: PC 03_02_2021 Minutes (2431 : Minutes 03-02-2021) RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Brian K. Horne, Member - Dan River District SECONDER: Janet Mease, Member - Callands-Gretna District AYES: Haymore, Harker, Henderson, Mease, Horne, Stowe, Waters ABSENT: Dudley CHAIRMAN'S REPORT There was no Chairman's Report. PUBLIC HEARING 1. Case R-21-005 Mabel Doss; Rezoning from A-1, Agricultural District, to R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District (Harker) Mr. Haymore opened the public hearing at 7:02 pm. Mrs. Ragsdale, Director of Community Development, reported that Mabel Doss has petitioned to rezone 2.01 acres, parts of GPIN 2533- 30-9754, located off Sycamore Road, in the Staunton River Election District from A-1, Agricultural District to R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District to combine with her adjacent property. Mrs. Ragsdale was available for any questions regarding the petition. There were no opposition to the petition. Mr. Haymore closed the public meeting at 7:07pm. A motion was made by Mr. Harker, seconded by Mrs. Mease, to recommend the Board of Supervisors grant the rezoning request. Motion passed by a 7 to 0 vote (one (1) member, Mr. Dudley was absent). RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Nathan Harker, Vice Chairman - Staunton River District SECONDER: Janet Mease, Member - Callands-Gretna District AYES: Haymore, Harker, Henderson, Mease, Horne, Stowe, Waters ABSENT: Dudley 2. Case R-21-006 Frank Martin and Linda Stroud; Rezoning from MHP, Residential Manufactured Housing Park District, to A-1, Agricultural District (Haymore) Mr. Haymore opened the public hearing at 7:08 pm. Mrs. Ragsdale, Director of Community Development, reported that Frank Martin and Linda Stroud has petitioned to rezone 19.47 acres, GPIN 2309-35-0488, located on State Road 746/Golf Club Road in the Westover Election District from MHP, Residential Manufactured Housing Park District, to A-1, Agricultural District to allow for agricultural use. Mr. Martin was present to represent the petition. There was no opposition to the petition. Mr. Haymore closed the public meeting at 7:11pm. A motion was made by Mrs. Mease, seconded by Mr. Harker, to recommend the Board of Supervisors grant the rezoning request. Motion passed by a 7 to 0 vote (one (1) member, Mr. Dudley was absent). This concludes the rezoning cases. 5.1.a Packet Pg. 5 Attachment: PC 03_02_2021 Minutes (2431 : Minutes 03-02-2021) RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Janet Mease, Member - Callands-Gretna District SECONDER: Nathan Harker, Vice Chairman - Staunton River District AYES: Haymore, Harker, Henderson, Mease, Horne, Stowe, Waters ABSENT: Dudley OLD BUSINESS There was no old business. NEW BUSINESS There was no new business. ADJOURNMENT Meeting was adjourned at approximately 7:11 p.m. 5.1.a Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: PC 03_02_2021 Minutes (2431 : Minutes 03-02-2021) Planning Commission STAFF SUMMARY Case: Case R-21-007 Cornerstone Church of Christ District: Banister Election District Zoning Request: R-1 to A-1 Agenda Date: April 06, 2021 Meeting History: SUBJECT Requested by Cornerstone Church of Christ, to rezone property located off State Road 703/Fairview N, in the Banister Election District and shown on the Tax Map as part of GPIN# 2436-01-4731. The applicant is requesting to rezone 1.74 acres from R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District, to A-1, Agricultural District, to combine with an adjacent parcel of land zoned A-1. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Cornerstone Church of Christ is requesting to rezone 1.74 acres from R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District, to A-1, Agricultural District, so that property lines may be adjusted. If rezoned, the property will be consolidated with an adjacent parcel currently zoned A-1, Agricultural District. All properties must share the same zoning classification to be consolidated, requiring the subject property to be rezoned prior to consolidation. A plat titled Cornerstone Church of Christ has been submitted with the application to identify where zoning changes are necessary and to present the proposed property line adjustments. Once the property is rezoned to A-1, all uses listed under Section 35-178 are a permitted use. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION The Comprehensive Plan designates the future land use as Agricultural and Rural Residential. ZONING AND CURRENT USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES Adjacent to A-1, Agricultural District and R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District zoned properties. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN A plat showing the area to be rezoned and proposed property line adjustments is included. 7.1 Packet Pg. 7 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends APPROVAL of Case R-21-007, submitted by Cornerstone Church of Christ, requesting to rezone 1.74 acres off State Road 703/Fairview N, in the Banister Election District and shown on the Tax Map as part of GPIN# 2436-01-4731, to allow property lines to be adjusted. The subject property is adjacent to properties currently zoned A-1, Agricultural District and the rezoning would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. PLANNING COMMISSION MOTIONS 1. Recommend approval of Case R-21-007 as submitted. 2. Recommend denial of Case R-21-007 as submitted. 7.1 Packet Pg. 8 7.1.a Packet Pg. 9 Attachment: R-21-007 Cornerstone App (2424 : Case R-21-007 Cornerstone Church of Christ) 7.1.a Packet Pg. 10 Attachment: R-21-007 Cornerstone App (2424 : Case R-21-007 Cornerstone Church of Christ) 7.1.a Packet Pg. 11 Attachment: R-21-007 Cornerstone App (2424 : Case R-21-007 Cornerstone Church of Christ) 7.1.a Packet Pg. 12 Attachment: R-21-007 Cornerstone App (2424 : Case R-21-007 Cornerstone Church of Christ) 7.1.a Packet Pg. 13 Attachment: R-21-007 Cornerstone App (2424 : Case R-21-007 Cornerstone Church of Christ) 7.1.a Packet Pg. 14 Attachment: R-21-007 Cornerstone App (2424 : Case R-21-007 Cornerstone Church of Christ) 7.1.a Packet Pg. 15 Attachment: R-21-007 Cornerstone App (2424 : Case R-21-007 Cornerstone Church of Christ) 7.1.a Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: R-21-007 Cornerstone App (2424 : Case R-21-007 Cornerstone Church of Christ) 7.1.b Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: R-21-007 Cornerstone Map (2424 : Case R-21-007 Cornerstone Church of Christ) Planning Commission STAFF SUMMARY Case: Case R-21-008 Gregory & Janie Robinson District: Callands-Gretna Election District Zoning Request: R-1 & A-1 to A-1 Agenda Date: April 06, 2021 Meeting History: SUBJECT Requested by Gregory and Janie Robinson, to rezone property located on State Road 750/Oxford Road, in the Callands-Gretna Election District and shown on the Tax Map as GPIN# 1580-34- 0963. The applicant is requesting to rezone 24.72 acres from R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District, and A-1, Agricultural District, to A-1, Agricultural District to allow for an additional dwelling to be placed on the property. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The Gregory and Janie Robinson are requesting to rezone 24.72 acres from R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District, and A-1, Agricultural District, to A-1, Agricultural District. The property is currently double zoned R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision and A-1, Agricultural. Previously, a plat was recorded combining two properties that did not share the same zoning classification without proper approval from the Subdivision Agent, giving the property two zoning classifications. In order to bring the property into compliance and assign a single zoning classification, the property must be rezoned. A map showing the original property lines is included. Additionally, the applicant is requesting to rezone to A-1, Agricultural District to allow for an additional dwelling. The applicants originally requested the construct a garage on their property. They have since requested to be able to put living quarters above the garage to use as a space for guests. Since there is currently a single-family dwelling occupied by the applicants, this would constitute a second dwelling. In order for this to be permitted, the property would need to be zoned A-1, Agricultural District. Once the property is rezoned to A-1, all uses listed under Section 35-178 are a permitted use. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION The Comprehensive Plan designates the future land use as Agricultural and Rural Residential. ZONING AND CURRENT USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES Adjacent to A-1, Agricultural District and R-E, Residential Estates District, zoned properties. 7.2 Packet Pg. 18 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN N/A RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends APPROVAL of Case R-21-008, submitted by Gregory and Janie Robinson, requesting to rezone 24.72 acres located on State Road 750/Oxford Road, in the Callands-Gretna Election District and shown on the Tax Map as GPIN# 1580-34-0963, from R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District, and A-1, Agricultural District, to A-1, Agricultural District The subject property is adjacent to properties currently zoned A-1, Agricultural District and the rezoning would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. PLANNING COMMISSION MOTIONS 1. Recommend approval of Case R-21-008 as submitted. 2. Recommend denial of Case R-21-008 as submitted. 7.2 Packet Pg. 19 7.2.a Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: R-21-008 Robinson Application (2425 : Case R-21-008 Gregory & Janie Robinson) 7.2.a Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: R-21-008 Robinson Application (2425 : Case R-21-008 Gregory & Janie Robinson) 7.2.a Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: R-21-008 Robinson Application (2425 : Case R-21-008 Gregory & Janie Robinson) 7.2.a Packet Pg. 23 Attachment: R-21-008 Robinson Application (2425 : Case R-21-008 Gregory & Janie Robinson) 7.2.a Packet Pg. 24 Attachment: R-21-008 Robinson Application (2425 : Case R-21-008 Gregory & Janie Robinson) 7.2.a Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: R-21-008 Robinson Application (2425 : Case R-21-008 Gregory & Janie Robinson) 7.2.b Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: R-21-008 Robinson Map (2425 : Case R-21-008 Gregory & Janie Robinson) Planning Commission STAFF SUMMARY Case: Case R-21-009 Haile Gatewood, Jr. District: Chatham-Blairs Election District Zoning Request: R-1 to A-1 Agenda Date: April 06, 2021 Meeting History: SUBJECT Requested by Halie Gatewood, Jr., to rezone property located on U.S. Highway 29, in the Chatham-Blairs Election District and shown on the Tax Map as part of GPIN#s 2423-43-3369 and part of 2423-43-1617. The applicant is requesting to rezone a total of 1.20 acres from R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District, to A-1, Agricultural District, to combine with an adjacent parcel of land zoned A-1. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Haile Gatewood, Jr. is requesting to rezone a total of 1.20 acres R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District, A-1, Agricultural District, so that property lines may be adjusted. If rezoned, the property will be consolidated with an adjacent parcel currently zoned A-1, Agricultural District. All properties must share the same zoning classification to be consolidated, requiring the subject property to be rezoned prior to consolidation. A plat titled Haile L. Gatewood, Jr. has been submitted with the application to identify the area where zoning changes are necessary and to present the proposed property line adjustments. Once the property is rezoned to A-1, all uses listed under Section 35-178 are a permitted use. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION The Comprehensive Plan designates the future land use as Agricultural and Rural Residential. ZONING AND CURRENT USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES Adjacent to A-1, Agricultural District and R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District zoned properties. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN A plat showing the area to be rezoned and proposed property line adjustments is included. RECOMMENDATION 7.3 Packet Pg. 27 Staff recommends APPROVAL of Case R-21-009, submitted by Haile Gatewood, Jr., requesting to rezone a total of 1.20 acres on U.S. Highway 29, in the Chatham-Blairs Election District and shown on the Tax Map as part of GPIN#s 2423-43-3369 and part of 2423-43-1617, to allow property lines to be adjusted. The subject property is adjacent to properties currently zoned A-1, Agricultural District and the rezoning would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. PLANNING COMMISSION MOTIONS 1. Recommend approval of Case R-21-009 as submitted. 2. Recommend denial of Case R-21-009 as submitted. 7.3 Packet Pg. 28 7.3.a Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: R-21-009 Gatewood Application (2426 : Case R-21-009 Haile Gatewood, Jr.) 7.3.a Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: R-21-009 Gatewood Application (2426 : Case R-21-009 Haile Gatewood, Jr.) 7.3.a Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: R-21-009 Gatewood Application (2426 : Case R-21-009 Haile Gatewood, Jr.) 7.3.a Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: R-21-009 Gatewood Application (2426 : Case R-21-009 Haile Gatewood, Jr.) 7.3.a Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: R-21-009 Gatewood Application (2426 : Case R-21-009 Haile Gatewood, Jr.) 7.3.a Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: R-21-009 Gatewood Application (2426 : Case R-21-009 Haile Gatewood, Jr.) 7.3.a Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: R-21-009 Gatewood Application (2426 : Case R-21-009 Haile Gatewood, Jr.) 7.3.b Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: R-21-009 Gatewood Map (2426 : Case R-21-009 Haile Gatewood, Jr.) Planning Commission STAFF SUMMARY Case: Case R-21-010 Mark Redd District: Banister Election District Zoning Request: A-1 to R-1 Agenda Date: April 06, 2021 Meeting History: SUBJECT Requested by Mark Redd, contract purchaser, to rezone property located off State Road 685/Chalk Level Road, in the Banister Election District and shown on the Tax Map as part of GPIN# 2437-88-5351. The applicant is requesting to rezone a total of 0.118 acres from A-1, Agricultural District, to R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District, to combine with an adjacent parcel of land zoned R-1. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Mark Redd is requesting to rezone a total of 0.118 acres from A-1, Agricultural District, to R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District, so that property lines may be adjusted. If rezoned, the property will be consolidated with an adjacent parcel currently zoned R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District. All properties must share the same zoning classification to be consolidated, requiring the subject property to be rezoned prior to consolidation. A plat titled Mark Alan Redd and Phyllis C. East. has been submitted with the application to identify the area where zoning changes are necessary and to present the proposed property line adjustments. Once the property is rezoned to R-1, all uses listed under Section 35-222 are a permitted use. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION The Comprehensive Plan designates the future land use as Agricultural and Rural Residential. ZONING AND CURRENT USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES Adjacent to A-1, Agricultural District and R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District zoned properties. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN A plat showing the area to be rezoned and proposed property line adjustments is included. 7.4 Packet Pg. 37 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends APPROVAL of Case R-21-010, submitted by Mark Redd, requesting to rezone a total of 0.118 acres located off State Road 685/Chalk Level Road, in the Banister Election District and shown on the Tax Map as part of GPIN# 2437-88-5351, to allow property lines to be adjusted. The subject property is adjacent to properties currently zoned R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District and the rezoning would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. PLANNING COMMISSION MOTIONS 1. Recommend approval of Case R-21-010 as submitted. 2. Recommend denial of Case R-21-010 as submitted. 7.4 Packet Pg. 38 7.4.a Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: R-21-10 Redd App (2427 : Case R-21-010 Mark Redd) 7.4.a Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: R-21-10 Redd App (2427 : Case R-21-010 Mark Redd) 7.4.a Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: R-21-10 Redd App (2427 : Case R-21-010 Mark Redd) 7.4.a Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: R-21-10 Redd App (2427 : Case R-21-010 Mark Redd) 7.4.a Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: R-21-10 Redd App (2427 : Case R-21-010 Mark Redd) 7.4.a Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: R-21-10 Redd App (2427 : Case R-21-010 Mark Redd) 7.4.b Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: R-21-010 Redd Map (2427 : Case R-21-010 Mark Redd) Planning Commission STAFF SUMMARY Case: Case R-21-011 Jeremy & Julia Watson District: Staunton River Election District Zoning Request: RC-1 to A-1 Agenda Date: April 06, 2021 Meeting History: SUBJECT Requested by Jeremy and Julia Watson, to rezone property located on State Road 665/Rockford School Road, in the Staunton River Election District and shown on the Tax Maps as GPIN # 2524-91-4600. The applicants are requesting to rezone 44.30 acres from RC-1, Residential Combined Subdivision District, to A-1, Agricultural District, to allow for agricultural use. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Jeremy and Julia Watson are requesting to rezone 44.30 acres from RC-1, Residential Combined Subdivision District, to A-1, Agricultural District. The applicant is requesting to use the property for livestock. Under the current zoning classification, this type of use would only be allowed as an incidental use. Section 35-51 of the Pittsylvania County Zoning Ordinance states that “incidental agricultural is permitted in any district that allows residential uses provided that such agricultural use shall not occupy over five (5) acres.” In order for the property to be used for agricultural uses that would allow livestock with the current RC-1 zoning classification, the agriculture use would have to remain under five (5) acres. The subject property is currently occupied by a single-family dwelling and is adjacent to properties zoned A-1, Agricultural District, to the west. Once the property is rezoned to A-1, all uses listed under Section 35-178 are a permitted use. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION The Comprehensive Plan designates the future land use as Agricultural and Rural Residential. ZONING AND CURRENT USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES Adjacent to A-1, Agricultural District, R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District, and RC- 1, Residential Combined Subdivision District zoned properties. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN N/A 7.5 Packet Pg. 46 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends APPROVAL of Case R-21-011, submitted by Jeremy and Julia Watson, to rezone property located on State Road 665/Rockford School Road, in the Staunton River Election District and shown on the Tax Maps as GPIN # 2524-91-4600, to allow for agricultural uses. The subject property is adjacent to properties currently zoned A-1, Agricultural District and the rezoning would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. PLANNING COMMISSION MOTIONS 1. Recommend approval of Case R-21-011 as submitted. 2. Recommend denial of Case R-21-011 as submitted. 7.5 Packet Pg. 47 7.5.a Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: R-21-011 Watson Application (2428 : Case R-21-011 Jeremy & Julia Watson) 7.5.a Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: R-21-011 Watson Application (2428 : Case R-21-011 Jeremy & Julia Watson) 7.5.a Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: R-21-011 Watson Application (2428 : Case R-21-011 Jeremy & Julia Watson) 7.5.a Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: R-21-011 Watson Application (2428 : Case R-21-011 Jeremy & Julia Watson) 7.5.a Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: R-21-011 Watson Application (2428 : Case R-21-011 Jeremy & Julia Watson) 7.5.a Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: R-21-011 Watson Application (2428 : Case R-21-011 Jeremy & Julia Watson) 7.5.b Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: R-21-011 Watson Map (2428 : Case R-21-011 Jeremy & Julia Watson) Planning Commission STAFF SUMMARY Case: Case R-21-012 Gentry Farms, LLC District: Dan River Election District Zoning Request: R-1 to A-1 Agenda Date: April 06, 2021 Meeting History: SUBJECT Requested by Gentry Farms, LLC, to rezone two (2) properties located off State Road 734/Clarks Mill Road, in the Dan River Election District and shown on the Tax Map as GPIN#s 2346-89- 0267 and 2346-99-5750. The applicant is requesting to rezone a total of 56.13 acres from R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District, to A-1, Agricultural District, to allow the property to be used for agricultural uses (livestock) and for a recreational use (event venue). BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Gentry Farms, LLC is requesting to rezone a total of 56.13 acres from R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District, to A-1, Agricultural District, to allow for agricultural uses and for an event venue. On February 3, 2021, a letter notifying Gentry Farms, LLC that the event venue operating on the property was a violation of the Pittsylvania County Zoning Ordinance. Due to the property’s current R-1 zoning classification, recreational uses are not permitted, and agricultural uses are only allowed as an incidental use that cannot occupy more than 5 acres. Staff met with representatives from Gentry Farms, LLC and discussed options to bring the property into compliance. In order to continue to operate as both a farm and an event venue, the property must be rezoned to A-1. If rezoned, Gentry Farms, LLC will also be required to apply for a Special Use Permit for the event venue. Once the property is rezoned to A-1, all uses listed under Section 35-178 are a permitted use. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION The Comprehensive Plan designates the future land use as Medium to High Density Residential. ZONING AND CURRENT USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES Adjacent to A-1, Agricultural District and R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District zoned properties. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 7.6 Packet Pg. 55 N/A RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends APPROVAL of Case R-21-012, submitted by Gentry Farms, LLC, requesting to rezone a total of 56.13 acres located off State Road 734/Clarks Mill Road, in the Dan River Election District and shown on the Tax Map as GPIN#s 2346-89-0267 and 2346-99-5750, to allow the property to be used for agricultural uses (livestock) and for a recreational use (event venue). The subject properties are adjacent to properties currently zoned A-1, Agricultural District and the rezoning would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. PLANNING COMMISSION MOTIONS 1. Recommend approval of Case R-21-012 as submitted. 2. Recommend denial of Case R-21-012 as submitted. 7.6 Packet Pg. 56 7.6.a Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: R-21-012 Gentry Farms, LLC App (2429 : Case R-21-012 Gentry Farms, LLC) 7.6.a Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: R-21-012 Gentry Farms, LLC App (2429 : Case R-21-012 Gentry Farms, LLC) 7.6.a Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: R-21-012 Gentry Farms, LLC App (2429 : Case R-21-012 Gentry Farms, LLC) 7.6.a Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: R-21-012 Gentry Farms, LLC App (2429 : Case R-21-012 Gentry Farms, LLC) 7.6.a Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: R-21-012 Gentry Farms, LLC App (2429 : Case R-21-012 Gentry Farms, LLC) 7.6.a Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: R-21-012 Gentry Farms, LLC App (2429 : Case R-21-012 Gentry Farms, LLC) 7.6.b Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: R-21-012 Gentry Farms LLC Map (2429 : Case R-21-012 Gentry Farms, LLC) Planning Commission STAFF SUMMARY Case: Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC District: Callands-Gretna Election District Zoning Request: Agenda Date: April 06, 2021 Meeting History: SUBJECT Requested by IPS Solar, LLC, for a Special Use Permit for a utility scale solar energy facility. The property is 62 acres, located off Highway 40/East Gretna Road, in the Callands-Gretna Election District and shown on the Pittsylvania County Tax Map as GPIN# 2530-46-8059. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION IPS Solar, LLC, is requesting a Special Use Permit to operate a utility scale solar energy facility on 62 acres, located off Highway 40/East Gretna Road, in the Callands-Gretna Election District. The project be a 4-megawatt (MW) alternating current (AC) utility scale solar energy facility, connecting to the Dominion Power grid. The company is proposing to cover approximately 23 acres in solar panels. The Pittsylvania County Zoning Ordinance requires a site plan and landscape plan to be submitted and approved prior to permits being issued to ensure compliance with setback and vegetative screening requirements. The applicant will also be required to submit an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and Stormwater Plan to the Community Development Department and the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality to ensure that all stormwater and erosion and sediment control regulations are being met. Once the plans are approved, the appropriate bonds will be required before land disturbance permits will be issued. A decommissioning plan is required to be submitted and a bond secured to ensure compliance with the plan at the end of the project’s life as well. All required plans must be approved before any construction permits will be issued. RELATIONSHIP TO THE SURROUNDING LAND USE AND NEIGHBORING AREAS Mostly surrounded by agricultural and residential uses. ZONING OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES Mostly surrounded by A-1, Agricultural District and R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District zoned properties. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN A conceptual plan is enclosed in the board packet. 7.7 Packet Pg. 64 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends APPROVAL of the request with the following conditions: 1. Site Development Plan; Location. All solar panels and other above-ground equipment will be located within the “Project Area” shown on the Conceptual Site Plan included with the SUP application. All Site Plan requirements of Section 35-141 must be met before permits are issued. 2. Height. Except for the collection yard and substation or otherwise as required by applicable building code, the maximum height of the solar panels and other above-ground equipment will be 15 feet. 3. Setbacks. Except for fencing and any pole mounted electronic lines, consistent with the County ordinance, all above-ground equipment will have a minimum front setback of at least 60 feet from the centerline of the specified right-of-way, or 35 feet from the edge of the right-of-way, whichever is greatest. The side setback shall be 10 percent of the road frontage distance, with a minimum of 10 feet. The rear minimum setback shall be at least 40 feet. No setbacks are required between the parcels lines of parcels that are part of a single Project. 4. Fencing. Fencing for the Project will be standard chain-link and at least 6 feet high. The Applicant shall maintain the fence for the life of the Project. 5. Landscaping. Applicant will comply with Section 35-121 Fencing – Screening. At the perimeter locations, the setback will include a minimum 15-foot-wide landscaped area comprised of any existing vegetation supplemented as needed with a staggered row of planted trees or large shrubs. The vegetation shall be evergreen and designed to be at least 15 feet in height at maturity of any new plantings and shall be a minimum of 6 feet in height at time of planting. Existing vegetation shall be maintained and supplemented with new plantings as needed to maintain required screening. Prior to construction and site plan approval, a landscaping maintenance plan will be submitted to the Zoning Administrator for approval, which shall provide for the posting of a bond or other surety in an amount sufficient to ensure that the plantings are successfully established and the landscaping is maintained or replaced during the life of the Project. 6. Construction Management and Mitigation. Prior to construction, the Applicant shall prepare and submit to the Zoning Administrator a construction management plan to address traffic control methods, site access, fencing, lighting, mitigation of construction operations, and hours of construction activity. 7. Road Repairs. All public and private roads must remain open during construction. Any damage to roads caused by construction will be promptly repaired to preconstruction conditions and/or VDOT standards where deemed necessary. 8. Erosion and Sediment Control. Prior to construction, an approved erosion and sediment control plan will be implemented for the entire Project, and an erosion and sediment control bond will be provided. 7.7 Packet Pg. 65 9. Stormwater Management. Prior to construction, a Virginia Stormwater Management Program Permit from the Virginia DEQ will be obtained for the Project, including an approved Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. 10. Operational Noise and Electrical Interference. The Project will comply with all applicable County requirements for noise and shall not generate or create electrical interruptions or interference with existing electrical or electronic uses. 11. Operational Light. Fixed lighting at the perimeter of the Project will be limited to gates and will be shielded/downward facing to minimize light spillage and shall be motion- activated. 12. Compliance. The project shall be designed, constructed, and tested to meet all applicable local, state, and federal standards. 13. Decommissioning. In accordance with Section 35-141(E), the applicant shall completely decommission the facility within 12 months, if the facility ceases to generate electricity for a continuous period of 12 months, including all solar collectors, cabling, electrical components, fencing and any other associated equipment, facilities and structures. Prior to construction and approval of the entire site plan, a decommissioning plan will be submitted to the Zoning Administrator, which shall provide for the posting of a bond or other surety acceptable to the County in the amount of the decommissioning costs, not including salvage value, for the Project. 14. Start of construction. The SUP will expire unless construction of the entire Project is commenced within 3 years of the date of issuance of the SUP. 15. Survival. So long as the Project is operated in conformance with these conditions, the SUP shall continue for the life of the Project. 16. Comply with all DEQ regulations regarding nonpoint source pollutants. Chemical sprays used in weed control shall comply with DEQ regulations. 17. Fire and Rescue Training. The applicant shall provide annual training to the local fire department regarding battery storage. PLANNING COMMISSION MOTIONS 1. Recommend approval of Case S-21-002 as submitted. 2. Recommend approval of Case S-21-002 subject to conditions by staff. 3. Recommend approval of Case S-21-002 subject to conditions by the Planning Commission. 4. Recommend denial of Case S-21-002 as submitted. 7.7 Packet Pg. 66 7.7.a Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 76 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 79 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 81 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 85 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 86 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 87 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 88 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 89 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 90 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 97 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 98 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 99 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.a Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar App (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) 7.7.b Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: S-21-002 ISP Solar Map (2430 : Case S-21-002 IPS Solar, LLC) Planning Commission STAFF SUMMARY Case: Case S-21-003 The Dock at SML, LLC District: Callands-Gretna Election District Zoning Request: Agenda Date: April 06, 2021 Meeting History: SUBJECT Requested by The Dock at SML, LLC, for a Special Use Permit for a Marina with Boat Storage. The properties are four (4) parcels of land, a total of 23.25 acres, located on State Road 626/Smith Mountain Road and Locus Lane, in the Callands-Gretna Election District and shown on the Tap Map as GPIN # 1563-52-1714, 1563-53-1917, 1563-53-1623 and 1563-53-1223. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The Dock at SML, LLC, is requesting a Special Use Permit to operate a marina and boat storage area on a total of 23.25 acres, located State Road 626/Smith Mountain Road and Locus Lane, in the Callands-Gretna Election District. A marina has been in operation on the property since before the Pittsylvania County Zoning Ordinance was adopted in 1991, making the use legal non-conforming. The applicant submitted a proposal to Community Development requesting to add additional boat slips and a dry storage area. Due to the non-conforming status, the applicant’s proposal was denied. According to Pittsylvania County Code § 35-164, non- conforming uses cannot be expanded or enlarged unless they can be brought into compliance. The Dock at SML, LLC is requesting a Special Use Permit for a marina to bring the property into compliance in accordance with Pittsylvania County Code § 35-295, allowing the marina to be expanded and dry boat storage to be added. If the Special Use Permit is denied, the marina will still be allowed to continue as a legal non- conforming use; however, they will not be allowed to modify the current boat slips or add additional storage areas. RELATIONSHIP TO THE SURROUNDING LAND USE AND NEIGHBORING AREAS Mostly surrounded by residential uses. ZONING OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES Mostly surrounded by A-1, Agricultural District, RC-1, Residential Combined Subdivision District, R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District, And RPD, Residential Planned Unit Development District zoned properties. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 7.8 Packet Pg. 112 A conceptual plan is enclosed in the board packet. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends APPROVAL of the request with the following conditions: 1. Must remain in compliance with all applicable Erosion and Sediment Control and Stormwater regulations 2. Must remain in compliance with all applicable Health Department regulations PLANNING COMMISSION MOTIONS 1. Recommend approval of Case S-21-003 as submitted. 2. Recommend approval of Case S-21-003 subject to conditions by staff. 3. Recommend approval of Case S-21-003 subject to conditions by the Planning Commission. 4. Recommend denial of Case S-21-003 as submitted. 7.8 Packet Pg. 113 7.8.a Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: S-21-003 Dock at SML staff (2432 : Case S-21-003 The Dock at SML, LLC) 7.8.a Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: S-21-003 Dock at SML staff (2432 : Case S-21-003 The Dock at SML, LLC) 7.8.b Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: S-21-003 Dock at SML App (2432 : Case S-21-003 The Dock at SML, LLC) 7.8.b Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: S-21-003 Dock at SML App (2432 : Case S-21-003 The Dock at SML, LLC) 7.8.b Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: S-21-003 Dock at SML App (2432 : Case S-21-003 The Dock at SML, LLC) 7.8.b Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: S-21-003 Dock at SML App (2432 : Case S-21-003 The Dock at SML, LLC) ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS Adjacent property owners are mailed a notice of the request. Please provide each owner's name and mailing address plus zip code for every Property adjacent to the site and directly across from any public right-of-way adjoining the site. Names and addresses are available in the County Tax Commissioners office in the Courthouse. Petition Parcel # _________________________________________________________ Name: __________________________________ GPIN: ________ Address: _______________________________________________________________ GPIN: Name: __________________________________ ________ Address: _______________________________________________________________ GPIN: Name: __________________________________ ________ Address: _______________________________________________________________ GPIN: Name: __________________________________ ________ Address: _______________________________________________________________ GPIN: Name: __________________________________ ________ Address: _______________________________________________________________ GPIN: Name: __________________________________ ________ Address: _______________________________________________________________ GPIN: Name: __________________________________ ________ Address: _______________________________________________________________ GPIN: Name: __________________________________ ________ Address: _______________________________________________________________ GPIN: Name: __________________________________ ________ Address: _______________________________________________________________ GPIN: Name: __________________________________ ________ Address: _______________________________________________________________ GPIN: Name: __________________________________ ________ Address: _______________________________________________________________ GPIN: Name: __________________________________ ________ Address: _______________________________________________________________ GPIN: Name: __________________________________ ________ Address: _______________________________________________________________ 7.8.b Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: S-21-003 Dock at SML App (2432 : Case S-21-003 The Dock at SML, LLC) ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS Adjacent property owners are mailed a notice of the request. Please provide each owner's name and mailing address plus zip code for every Property adjacent to the site and directly across from any public right-of-way adjoining the site. Names and addresses are available in the County Tax Commissioners office in the Courthouse. Petition Parcel # _________________________________________________________ Name: __________________________________ GPIN: ________ Address: _______________________________________________________________ GPIN: Name: __________________________________ ________ Address: _______________________________________________________________ GPIN: Name: __________________________________ ________ Address: _______________________________________________________________ GPIN: Name: __________________________________ ________ Address: _______________________________________________________________ GPIN: Name: __________________________________ ________ Address: _______________________________________________________________ GPIN: Name: __________________________________ ________ Address: _______________________________________________________________ GPIN: Name: __________________________________ ________ Address: _______________________________________________________________ GPIN: Name: __________________________________ ________ Address: _______________________________________________________________ GPIN: Name: __________________________________ ________ Address: _______________________________________________________________ GPIN: Name: __________________________________ ________ Address: _______________________________________________________________ GPIN: Name: __________________________________ ________ Address: _______________________________________________________________ GPIN: Name: __________________________________ ________ Address: _______________________________________________________________ GPIN: Name: __________________________________ ________ Address: _______________________________________________________________ 7.8.b Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: S-21-003 Dock at SML App (2432 : Case S-21-003 The Dock at SML, LLC) 7.8.b Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: S-21-003 Dock at SML App (2432 : Case S-21-003 The Dock at SML, LLC) WATERLOCKE D R O A D SMITH MOUNTAIN ROADVA STATE ROUTE 62660' PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAYWATER L O C K E D R O A D PRIVATE ROAD - M A P B O O K 1 P A G E 1 9 SMITH MOUNTAIN LAKE LOCUST LANE VA STATE ROUTE 890 30' PRESCRIPTIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY SMITH MOUNTAIN LAKE 10.519 ACRESLOT 2-A 2.350 ACRESLOT A-1 6.794 ACRESLOT 1-A 3.589 ACRESLOT 2-B SMITH MOUNTAIN ROADVA STATE ROUTE 62660' PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY0.292 ACRES TOTAL 0.384 ACRES TOTAL REFER TO SUP APPLICATION APPENDIX A FOR MARINA WATERFRONT STRUCTURE LIST IDNETIFYING EXISTING AND PROPOSED CONDITIONS © 2021 Microsoft Corporation © 2021 TomTom 2122 Carolina Ave, SW Roanoke, VA 24014 Ph: 540-387-1153 1915-B W. Cary Street Richmond, VA 23220 Phone: 804-358-2947 www.parkerdg.com These documents are the property of ParkerDesign Group (PDG) and may not be reproducedor used without the express permission of PDG.Any reuse of these documents withoutauthorization of PDG will be at the sole risk ofthe individual or entity utilizing said documents. ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS DESIGN GROUP DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: SCALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER: REVISIONS SHEET TITLE: 20-0126 FEBRUARY 26, 2021184 LOCUST LANEPITTSYLVANIA COUNTY, VIRGINIATHE DOCK ATSMITH MOUNTAIN LAKESPECIAL USE PERMIT - CONCEPTPDG JMD JDE/SLR 1" = 60' SPECIAL USE PERMIT CONCEPT PLAN X01 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 060 60 120 60 30 SITE STATISTICS PROPERTY LOCATION: SMITH MOUNTAIN ROAD (#4690 AS REF.) MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CALLAND-GRETNA CURRENT OWNER:THE DOCK AT SML, LLC. CURRENT ZONING: RPD (RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) PROPOSED ZONING: UNCHANGED MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CALLAND-GRETNA PARCELS INCLUDED:1563-52-2941 = 06.79-ACRES 1563-53-1260 = 02.35-ACRES 1563-53-1223 = 03.59-ACRES 1563-53-1623 =10.52-ACRES TOTAL ACERAGE = 23.25-ACRES SUP REQUESTING MARINA OPERATIONS AND BOAT STORAGE: ·ADDED AND EXPANDED DRY STACK BOAT STORAGE** INCLUDES NEW ACCESS ROAD AND CONCRETE MANUVERING -LIFTING PAD ·MARINA** INCLUDES EXISTING COVERED DOCKS & BOAT SLIPS, EXISTING DOCK OFFICE AND FUELING STATIONS, EXISTING SLIPS (COVERED & UNCOVERED), NEW CONCRETE PIER WITH TENDING DOCK AND SLIPS, ADDITION OF ROOF COVERS AND ADDED SLIPS, ADDITIONAL COURTESY SLIPS, & BOARDWALK. ·PRIVATE UTILITIES ·OPEN SPACE (INCLUDING RECREATIONAL SPACE) **REQUIRES SPECIAL EXCEPTION - THE MARINA IS CURRENTLY EXISTING LEGAL NON-CONFORMING USE MIN. LOT AREA: 5-ACRES (RPD) MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT:80-FEET PROP. BUILDING HEIGHT: 40-FEET± (DRY STACK BOAT STORAGE) MINIMUM LOT AREA: ·FRONT = 35-FEET FROM RIGHT-OF-WAY ·SIDE = 10-FEET ·REAR = 30-FEET (20-FEET FOR SINGLE FAMILY CONTIGUOUS WITH SML) FLOOR AREA REQ: NOT REGULATED MIN. OFF-STREET PARKING: PER ZONING §35-80 TO §35-82 (EX UNCHANGED) MINIMUM OPEN SPACE: PER ZONING SECTION §35-301 ·NOT LESS THAN 50% OF TOTAL GROSS AREA OF RPD ·REQUIRED RECREATIONAL SPACE NOT LESS THAN 5% OF TOTAL AREA OF RPD SITE LEGEND PETITION PARCELS HAVE BEEN HIGHLIGHTED IN RED.EXPANDED BOAT STORAGE ITEMS HAVE BEEN HIGHLIGHTED IN BLUE. SEE SUPAPPLICATION APPENDIX "C DRAWING FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT LAYOUT.MARINA ITEMS HAVE BEEN HIGHLIGHTED IN GREEN. REFER TO SUP APPLICATIONAPPENDIX A FOR DETAILED SUMMARY OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED ELEMENTS. DEVELOPMENT NOTES 1.THE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON MEETS THE REQUIRED MINIMUM INFORMATION SUPPORTING THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION. 2.AERIAL IMAGERY SHOWN IS FROM MICROSOFT CORPORATION “LIVE” IMAGERY AVAILABLE UNDER AUTODESK LICENSING. IMAGERY IS INCLUDED FOR VISUALIZATION OF THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT AND MAY NOT REPRESENT CURRENT CONDITIONS. THE EXISTING LODGE HAS BEEN DEMOLISHED AS WELL AS AN EXISTING DRY STACK STORAGE BUILDING (REFER TO AEP PERMIT PACKAGE). 3.TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN IS SOURCED FROM BOTH FIELD RUN AND AVAILABLE GIS DATA. 4.THE EXISTING PROPERTY BOUNDARIES COMPRISING THE MASTER PLAN AREA ARE BASED ON A RECORDED PLAT OF SURVEY PREPARED BY PARKER DESIGN GROUP, INC., DATED OCTOBER 20, 2020 AND RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 45 - PAGES 21W & 21X (INSTRUMENT #20-06147). THE PLAT IS ATTACHED AS AN EXHIBIT TO THE SUP APPLICATION DEFINING MEETS AND BOUNDS OF THE PROPERTIES. 5.ALL PLANNED STRUCTURES AND SUPPORTING INFRASTRUCTURE SHALL CONFORM TO ALL APPLICABLE REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS OF THE COUNTY, VDOT, DEQ, USACE, AND THE VDH. 6.WATER AND SEWER SERVICES ARE EXISTING AND PERMITTED THROUGH THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT. THERE ARE NO CHANGES CURRENTLY PLANNED TO THE EXISTING SERVICES. THE NEW DRY STACK STORAGE FACILITIES DO NOT REQUIRE WATER OR SEWER CONNECTIONS. 7.INTERNAL ACCESS ROADS CURRENTLY SERVING THE COMMUNITY ARE PRIVATE AND WILL REMAIN UNCHANGED. LOCUST LANE IS AN EXISTING PRIVATE ROAD THAT SERVES THIS PROPERTY AND ADJACENT PARCELS WITH CONNECTION TO SMITH MOUNTAIN ROAD - ROUTE 626. 8.SITE PLANS (EROSION CONTROL PLANS) ARE CURRENTLY IN REVIEW FOR THE NEW DRY STACK BOAT STORAGE BUILDINGS. COUNTY, DEQ, AND AEP HAVE GENERATED 1ST/ REVIEW COMMENTS WHICH WILL BE ADDRESSED AND RESUBMITTED FOR PERMIT APPROVAL. VICINITY MAP SCALE = 1"=2000' 7.8.b Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: S-21-003 Dock at SML App (2432 : Case S-21-003 The Dock at SML, LLC) Date: December 23, 2020 To: Mr. Neal Holthouser AEP Shoreline Management Group Re: The Dock at SML (formerly known as Smith Mountain Lake Dock and Lodge) Submittal for Occupancy & Use Permit (Single Unified Permit) On behalf of the property owners, Dock at SML, LLC, we hereby submit documentation requesting a unified Occupancy & Use Permit (OUP) for the properties comprising The Dock at SML waterfront. It is the desire of the owners to bring facilities in to conformance with current Shoreline Management Plan (SMP) regulations and provide expanded facilities to accommodate visitors to this beautiful lakefront location in Pittsylvania County. The permit documents that are provided represent the immediate objectives of the waterfront enterprise as a whole and establishes a master plan of existing and proposed amenities. Per AEP’s objectives - this unified permit will provide the basis for permit issuance and any additional opportunities as they are identified. The masterplan which is included in this submission, along with the Project Narrative, describes existing conditions per the AEP Status of Property Letter issued June 26, 2019 (attached) and proposed expansions and additions to dock facilities. The narrative identifies structure numbers as labeled in the AEP status letter and defines proposed additions in detail. SUP APPENDIX A SUP APPENDIX A - PAGE 1 7.8.b Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: S-21-003 Dock at SML App (2432 : Case S-21-003 The Dock at SML, LLC) We hope that this submission meets your expectations and will help facilitate the review process in an organized, defined manner. We appreciate your time in this matter and look forward to working with the Shoreline Management Group during the permitting process. Please do not hesitate to call should you have any questions or need additional information. Respectfully, PARKER DESIGN GROUP, Inc. Jack Ellinwood, LA Senior Project Manager jellinwood@parkerdg.com 2122 Carolina Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Office: 540-387-1153 Mobile: 540-588-3311 CC: Dock at SML. LLC File Attachments SUP APPENDIX A - PAGE 2 7.8.b Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: S-21-003 Dock at SML App (2432 : Case S-21-003 The Dock at SML, LLC) SECTION 1: NARRATIVE Appalachian Power (AEP) has the responsibility and authority to regulate and monitor usages and occupancy of project lands and waters in the Smith Mountain Pumped Storage Project. The Smith Mountain Pumped Storage Project includes reservoirs of Smith Mountain Lake and Leesville Lake, under issuance by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). AEP has a Shoreline Management Plan in place since August 2003, which requires property owners obtain an Occupancy & Use Permit, prior to construction, modification, and/or expansion of any structure located within the 800-ft elevation contour at Smith Mountain Lake. Permitting is required for structures located along the shoreline of Smith Mountain Lake and adjacent to the following parcels: • Parcel ID: 1563-52-2941 – Smith Mountain Lake Dock & Lodge Lot 1 • Parcel ID: 1563-52-5816 – Smith Mountain Lake Dock & Lodge Lot C • Parcel ID: 1563-53-1260 – Smith Mountain Lake Dock & Lodge Lot A • Parcel ID: 1563-53-3617 – Smith Mountain Lake Dock & Lodge Subdivided Revised Lot 2 • Parcel ID: 1563-53-4051 – Smith Mountain Lake Dock & Lodge Lot B • Parcel ID: 1563-63-0309 – A R Lumpkin Subdivision Lot 3 The parcels included in the site for permitting contains approximately 27.6 acres. The site currently features 2 structures located along the adjacent shoreline below the 795-ft elevation contour at Smith Mountain Lake. The site also includes three structures located on Smith Mountain Pumped Storage Project lands. See attached site map for structure delineation. SECTION 2: STRUCTURE DESCRIPTIONS Structure A • Existing Conditions: Existing floating dock, uncovered, & no boat slips. Non-Conforming. • Proposed Improvements: To be demolished. Structure B • Existing Conditions: Habitable lodge with uncovered stationary decking, two uncovered floating docks without boat slips, & covered porch area. Non-Conforming. • Proposed Improvements: Demolished. Structure C • Existing Conditions: 12 covered stationary boat slips (four are perpendicular to shore at end – to be converted to parallel). SUP APPENDIX A - PAGE 3 7.8.b Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: S-21-003 Dock at SML App (2432 : Case S-21-003 The Dock at SML, LLC) • Proposed Improvements: Existing stationary boat slips and cover to remain. Six finger boat slips (floaters) to be added and cover extended. Floating slips added will be similar to Structure C slips (See photo exhibit). Slips are 14.5’ center – center and 25’ long. Four existing perpendicular slips to be converted to parallel slips as part of improvements. Cover extension to be 60’L x 58’W (3,480 SF) and ridge height, roof slope and materials will match existing (surveyed elevation to overhang 807.0 – 12 feet above 795.0). Roof support piling to match existing. Will match dock elevations above full pond at 3.4’ (surveyed elevation 799.4 – 795.0). Structure D • Existing Conditions: Floating dock with 10 uncovered finger boat slips parallel to the shoreline. New application for OUP required for existing and proposed improvements. • Proposed Improvements: Existing boat slips to remain, two (2) finger boat slips (floaters) and new cover over boat slips to be added. Cover construction will be similar to existing Structure C (See photo exhibit). Proposed slips are 14.5’ center – center and 25’ long. Cover extension to be 106’L x 58’W (6,148 SF) and ridge height, roof slope and materials will match existing Structure C (elevation to overhang 807.0 – 12 feet above 795.0). Roof support pilings to be wooden driven piles as on Structure C. Dock and floating slip elevations are 1.0’ above full pond at 796.0. Structure E • Existing Conditions: Stationary dock with roofed enclosure areas containing two bathrooms and two storage areas; floating dock with roofed enclosure areas containing a store, kitchen, and storage; gas pumps; one floating uncovered boat slip. • Proposed Improvements: Two floating courtesy boat slips (Structures E.2 & E.3) to be added, existing structure to remain unchanged. Floating slips added will be similar to Structure C slips (See photo exhibit). Structure E.1 • Existing Conditions: 14’x12’ storage building and dumpster. • Proposed Improvements: Storage building and dumpster to be removed and/or relocated outside of the Smith Mountain Pumped Storage Project area prior to future AEP permit issuance. Structure E.2 (New Proposed) • Proposed Improvements: Addition of 6 floating courtesy boat slips at dock master building (10.5’ wide x 25’ long); gas pumps to remain. Floating slips added will be similar to Structure C slips (See photo exhibit). Elevation above 795.0 to match existing +\- 1.0’ at 796.0. Existing and proposed slips are 14.5’ center – center and 25’ long. SUP APPENDIX A - PAGE 4 7.8.b Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: S-21-003 Dock at SML App (2432 : Case S-21-003 The Dock at SML, LLC) Structure E.3 (New Proposed) • Proposed Improvements: Addition of 6 floating courtesy boat slips at dock master building (10.5’ wide by 25’ long); gas pumps to remain. Floating slips added will be similar to Structure C slips (See photo exhibit). Elevation above 795.0 to match existing +\- 1.0’ at 796.0. Existing and proposed slips are 14.5’ center – center and 25’ long. Structure F • Existing Conditions: Concrete boat ramp; courtesy pier; catwalk; one uncovered boat slip; floating walkway connecting Structure F to Structure E. • Proposed Improvements: None planned. Courtesy pier and catwalk to be removed as requireded in AEP property status report. Structure G • Existing Conditions: 14 covered stationary boat slips. Non-Conforming. • Proposed Improvements: None planned. Structure G.1 • Existing Conditions: Dry boat storage with 39 boat slips. Non-Conforming. • Proposed Improvements: Demolished. Slope Stabilization to be provided where building removed (cut face) – layback of slope with installation of blanket matting and seed to be completed. New separate dry stack storage building to be built in new location – see ‘Exhibit B1’ site plan (outside SMP). Structure H • Existing Conditions: Enclosed building/boat rental office (Approximately 25’x16’) • Proposed Improvements: No improvements planned at this time. Non permissible modifications have been removed including existing piling expansion, roof expansion, and walls. Structure I • Existing Conditions: Six uncovered floating flinger boat slips parallel to the shoreline. • Proposed Improvements: Existing boat slips to remain, two (2) boat slips (floaters) to be added. New OUP application required for existing and proposed improvements. Floating slips added will be similar to Structure C slips (See photo exhibit). Elevation above 795.0 to match existing +\- 1.0’ at 796.0. Existing and proposed slips are 14.5’ center – center and 25’ long. Structure I-1 • Existing Conditions: Two-bay covered pole barn. • Proposed Improvements: To be demolished. Stored or stockpiled materials and garaged cars to be removed. SUP APPENDIX A - PAGE 5 7.8.b Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: S-21-003 Dock at SML App (2432 : Case S-21-003 The Dock at SML, LLC) Structure J • Existing Conditions: Floating metal boat house, uncovered floating boat slip with curved metal roof; one U-shaped uncovered floating dock; and one floating dock creating an uncovered boat slip. • Proposed Improvements: To be demolished. A new elevated pier is proposed in this location along with new floating tending docks (identified as Structure “T” on master plan map). These amenities are proposed to support two new dry stack storage buildings to be built above the 100 year flood plain and outside SMP (see detailed location exhibit). The facility site plan is currently under review by Pittsylvania County and DEQ (See ‘Exhibit B’). Structure K, L, M, N, O • Existing Conditions: Floating uncovered piers, no boat slips. • Proposed Improvements: None. The small floating dock between docks K and L has been removed. Structure P • Existing Conditions: Stationary dock; one boat slip; and party deck. Non-conforming. • Proposed Improvements: None - will be removed if required by new, unified OUP. Structure Q • Existing Conditions: Uncovered stationary decking; no boat slips. • Proposed Improvements: Structure to be removed. Structure R • Existing Conditions: Uncovered floating dock; one uncovered stationary boat slip (pilings). Non- Conforming. • Proposed Improvements: None. Structure S • Existing Conditions: Uncovered floating dock; one uncovered floating boat slip; four uncovered stationary boat slips (pilings); and two walkways. • Proposed Improvements: None. As-built survey required to determine compliance with SMP for Low Density Commercial. Structure T (New Proposed) • Proposed Improvements: Boat drop pier and tending dock with three boat slips (dry stack storage drops). These amenities are proposed to support two new dry stack storage buildings to be built above the 100 year flood plain (see detailed location exhibit). The facility site plan is currently under review by Pittsylvania County and DEQ (See ‘Exhibit B’). SUP APPENDIX A - PAGE 6 7.8.b Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: S-21-003 Dock at SML App (2432 : Case S-21-003 The Dock at SML, LLC) Structure U (New Proposed) • Proposed Improvements: 8’ wide wooden boardwalk with rail over rip-rap shoreline protection; driven steel or wood piles, elevated to existing pavement height. SECTION 3: SUMMARY & CONCLUSIONS Many of the structures and improvements associated with this site existed prior to the implementation of the Shoreline Management Plan in August of 2003. Per Status of Properties report, completed by AEP, all structures and improvements documented under the ENCS documentation are considered to be non-conforming, but eligible for permitting under the Legacy Program. The Legacy Program is outlined in Section 2.6, Documentation Program, of the Shoreline Management Plan (August 2003). Appalachian Power’s inspection of June 11, 2019, found the site eligible for the Legacy Program, and no substantial modifications have occurred since the submittal of the ENCS documentation: • Structure A • Structure B • Structure C (modified since August 2003 – Verify catwalks have been removed.) • Structure E (modified since August 2003 – Not expanded.) • Structure G • Structure G.1 • Structure I-1 • Structure K, L, M, N, O • Structure P • Structure Q (Documentation required) • Structure R • Structure S Appalachian Power’s inspection also determined that significant modifications have been made within the Smith Mountain Pumped Storage Project boundary since the submittal of the ENCS documentation in February of 2006, without the benefit of a permit from Appalachian Power. Several undocumented structures must be removed from the project boundary including: • Structure E.1 (Verify undocumented 14’x12’ storage building and dumpster has been removed). SUP APPENDIX A - PAGE 7 7.8.b Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: S-21-003 Dock at SML App (2432 : Case S-21-003 The Dock at SML, LLC) • Structure H (Verify undocumented enclosed building/boat rental office has been removed). • Structure K & L (Verify floating dock between the two piers have been removed). • Structure Q (Verify undocumented uncovered stationary decking with boat slips have been removed). Appalachian Power has considered a single, unified Occupancy & Use Permit application for all of the structures associated with the Smith Mountain Lake Dock & Lodge site. Upon issuance, the permit would govern all structures within the Smith Mountain Pumped Storage project boundary associated with the Smith Mountain Lake Dock & Lodge site; establishing a master plan for all dock structures. Future requests for modifications would come in the form of an amendment to the master plan, permitting the requested modification(s) and re-permitting all other as-built structures. The following structures may be permitted in their existing condition, as they were the subject of the 2007 application for Occupancy & Use Permit (which was approved by AEP, but not executed by the property owner at the time): • Structure D • Structure I Need to verify that the following structures have been modified and qualify for permitting: • Structure F – modified to remove stationary catwalk and floating walkway connecting to Structure E • Structure L – modified to remove covered boat slip with curved metal roof and uncovered floating structures, so that only the covered enclosed boat house remains • Structure S* – modified to meet the Shoreline Management Plan requirements for Low Density Commercial facilities, as outlined in Section 2.4.4, Low Density Use Regulations, Low Density Commercial. *Note: Structure S is associated with Parcel ID: 1563-63-0309, which is not contiguous with the remainder of The Dock at SML site and are considered for a separate application for permitting by AEP. SUP APPENDIX A - PAGE 8 7.8.b Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: S-21-003 Dock at SML App (2432 : Case S-21-003 The Dock at SML, LLC) A B C D E E3 E2 E1 F G-1 G H I I-1 T J K L M N OP R SQ 2122 Carolina Ave, SW Roanoke, VA 24014 Ph: 540-387-1153 Fax: 540-389-5767 www.parkerdg.comENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS DESIGN GROUP FIGURESCALE: PROJECT: DESIGNED:DRAWN:CHECKED: DATE: DOCK PLAN THE DOCK AT SML LOCUST DRIVE, PITTSYLVANIA COUNTY, VIRGINIA PDGCEP/JDEJDE 11/23/2020 1" = 100' 20-0126 A LOCATION OF NEW DRYSTACK STORAGE BUILDINGS(ALL CONTOURS ABOVETHE 800' CONTOUR) 8' WOODEN BOARDWALK OVER RIP-RAPSHORELINE PROTECTION DRIVEN STEEL ORWOOD PILES. ELEVATED TO EXISTINGPAVEMENT HEIGHT (796'-797') NOTE: ALL CONCRETE/PAVED AREASTO REMAIN BELOW 800' CONTOURUNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.(SEE PERMITTING PACKAGE) 795' CONTOURTYPICAL 800' CONTOURTYPICAL 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 0100 100 200 100 50 1/3 COVEDELINEATION(TYPICAL) APPROX. LIMITS OFHIGH-DENSITY MULTI-USE SUP APPENDIX A - PAGE 9 7.8.b Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: S-21-003 Dock at SML App (2432 : Case S-21-003 The Dock at SML, LLC) 7.8.bPacket Pg. 133Attachment: S-21-003 Dock at SML App (2432 : Case S-21-003 The Dock at SML, LLC) 7.8.bPacket Pg. 134Attachment: S-21-003 Dock at SML App (2432 : Case S-21-003 The Dock at SML, LLC) ggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggS 20°47'54" W81.33L32L28L27L26 L25L24L23L22L21L20L19L18L17L16gggggggggggggggggggggggg g g g g ggggg2122 Carolina Ave, SWRoanoke, VA 24014Ph: 540-387-11531915-B W. Cary StreetRichmond, VA 23220Phone: 804-358-2947www.parkerdg.comThese documents are the property of ParkerDesign Group (PDG) and may not be reproducedor used without the express permission of PDG.Any reuse of these documents withoutauthorization of PDG will be at the sole risk ofthe individual or entity utilizing said documents.ENGINEERS SURVEYORSPLANNERS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSTHE DOCK ATSMITH MOUNTAIN LAKE                 SUP APPENDIX C44'31'NOT TO SCALE IMAGE REDUCED7.8.bPacket Pg. 135Attachment: S-21-003 Dock at SML App (2432 : Case S-21-003 The Dock at SML, LLC)