Loading...
11-28-2017 Business Meeting November 28, 2017 Business Meeting Pittsylvania County Board of Supervisors Business Meeting November 28, 2017 VIRGINIA: The Business meeting of the Pittsylvania County Board of Supervisors was held on Monday, November 28, 2017 in the General District Courtroom of the Edwin R. Shields Courthouse Addition in Chatham, Virginia. Chair Robert W. “Bob” Warren, called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. The following members were present: Tim R. Barber Tunstall District Joe B. Davis Dan River District Ronald S. Scearce Westover District Jessie L. Barksdale Banister District Jerry A. Hagerman Callands-Gretna District Elton W. Blackstock, Jr. Staunton River District Robert W. Warren Chatham-Blairs District Mr. David M. Smitherman, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board; Mr. J. Vaden Hunt, County Attorney; Mr. Greg L. Sides, Assistant County Administrator for Planning & Administration, Mr. Richard Hicks, Assistant County Administrator for Operations, Ms. Kim Van Der Hyde, Director of Finance, Jim Davis, Director of Public Safety, and Ms. Rebecca Flippen, Deputy Clerk were also present. Mr. Warren asked during the Moment of Silence, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. Items to be Added Motion was made by Mr. Scearce, seconded by Mr. Davis, to add the following item to the agenda: Contract Amendment #6 for Harris Radio, Corporation. Mr. Scearce's motion was unanimously approved by the following Roll Call Vote: Mr. Barber- Yes; Mr. Hagerman-Yes; Mr. Blackstock-Yes; Mr. Scearce-Yes; Mr. Davis-Yes; Mr. Barksdale- Yes; and Mr. Warren-Yes. Approval of Agenda Motion was made by Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. Davis, to approve the agenda with the additional items, and the following Roll Call Vote was recorded: Mr. Barber-Yes; Mr. Hagerman-Yes; Mr. Blackstock-Yes; Mr. Scearce-Yes; Mr. Davis-Yes; Mr. Barksdale-Yes; and Mr. Warren-Yes. Mr. Barber’s motion was unanimously approved by the Board. Hearing of the Citizens James Owens of the Callands-Gretna District questioned why the County did not follow the method of green box removal after building additional compactor sites like they did at the Mt. Hermon, Cherrystone, and 41 sites in the County. Mr. Owens does not believe all the sites of removal in the Callands-Gretna District are withing 5 driving miles of compactor sites. Some people, said Mr. Owen, are driving up to 8 miles one-way to dispose of trash. Mr. Owens said 8 green boxes, 2 were left. So people are overloading the green box sites and it’s the citizens of Board of Supervisors Business Meeting November 28, 2017 the area cleaning up those sites, not the county employees. Mr. Owens feels the people treated in the Callands-Gretna area have not been treated the same as the people in the Mt. Hermon area. Mary Catherine Plaster of the Chatham-Blairs District, and representing the Pittsylvania County Historical Society, thanked the Board of Supervisors for their commitment to preserving the County’s history and their participation during the year in celebrating the County’s 250 th anniversary, and presented one of the Historical Society’s special Christmas ornaments to each Board member and the County Administrator. Hubert Hudson of the Tunstall District expressed his concerns on the need for all the new positions in the County; reimbursements in County Administration, and accountability o f the Board of Supervisors. Barbara Hancock of the Callands-Gretna District thanked everyone who gave support during the recent election campaign as she sought the seat as the Callands-Gretna District representative on the Board of Supervisors. Ms. Hancock stated she had filed for a re-count. She thanked the Board for everything they do. Amy Boles, Tourism Coordinator for the Danville-Pittsylvania County Chamber of Commerce, distributed Tshirts to the Board and gave a tourism update that include information on the Chamber’s launching of the tourism website, Experience Danville Pittsylvania County (http://www.experiencedpc.com/) and the new LOVE sign that would be moved from location to location throughout the County and City of Danville. No one else signed up to speak. Consent Agenda Motion was made by Mr. Barksdale, seconded by Mr. Davis., to approve the Consent Agenda, and the following Roll Call Vote was recorded: Mr. Barber-Yes; Mr. Hagerman-Yes; Mr. Blackstock-Yes; Mr. Scearce-Yes; Mr. Davis-Yes; Mr. Barksdale-Yes; and Mr. Warren-Yes. Mr. Blackstock’s motion was unanimously approved by the Board. (a) Minutes (October 17, 2017, Work Session/Business Meetings; September 6, 2017 BOS & IDA Joint Meeting) (b) Bill List (October 2017; Online) (c) Ratification of Letter of Support: INFRA Application for Danville Rail Infrastructure & Chesapeake Port Improvements (d) Road Name Request: Non Canis Lane Public Hearings Rezoning Public Hearings: Case 1: TRC Acquistions & Holdings, LLC; Westover Election District: R-17-039 RC-1, Residential Combined Subdivision District to B-2, Business District, Limited TRC Acquistions & Holdings, LLC submitted a request to withdraw their rezoning application without penalty in order to further consult with the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). Motion was made by Mr. Scearce, seconded by Mr. Davis, to approve Board of Supervisors Business Meeting November 28, 2017 accepting TRC Acquisitions & Holding, LLC request to withdraw Case R-17-039 without penalty, and the following Roll Call Vote was recorded: Mr. Barber-Yes; Mr. Hagerman-Yes; Mr. Blackstock-Yes; Mr. Scearce-Yes; Mr. Davis-Yes; Mr. Barksdale-Yes; and Mr. Warren-Yes. Mr. Scearce’s motion was unanimously approved by the Board. Case 2: William H. Rogers, Jr. & Others; Banister Election District; R-17-040 R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District to B-2, Business District, General Mr. Warren opened the public hearing at 7:29pm. Mr. Sides explained William H. Rogers, Jr., and Others had petitioned to rezone 1.20 acres, located on U.S. Highway 29 North in the Banister Election District from R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District to B-2, Business District, General (for future commercial development). Once the property is rezoned to B-2, all uses listed under Section 35-365 are a permitted use. The Planning Commission, with no opposition, recommended granting the petitioners’ request. William Rogers was there to represent the petition. No one signed up to speak and Mr. Warren closed the hearing at 7:31pm. Motion was made by Mr. Barksdale, seconded by Mr. Davis, to approve rezoning Case R-17-040 from R-1 to B-2 and the following Roll Call Vote was recorded: Mr. Barber-Yes; Mr. Hagerman-Yes; Mr. Blackstock-Yes; Mr. Scearce-Yes; Mr. Davis-Yes; Mr. Barksdale-Yes; and Mr. Warren-Yes. Mr. Blackstock’s motion was unanimously approved by the Board. Case 3: William H. Rogers, Jr. & Judith R. Rogers; Banister Election District; R-17-041; R-17-041 A-1, Agricultural District & RC-1, Residential Combined Subdivision District to M-2, Industrial District, Heavy Industry Mr. Warren opened the hearing at 7:32pm. Mr. Sides explained that William H. Rogers, Jr., and Judith Rogers had petitioned to rezone a total of 88.41 acres, three (3) parcels of land, located off U.S. Highway 29 North in the Banister Election District from A-1, Agricultural District and RC-1, Residential Combined Subdivision District to M-2, Industrial District, Heavy Industry (for future industrial development). Once the properties are rezoned to M-2, all uses listed under Section 35-402 are a permitted use. The Planning Commission, with opposition, recommended granting the petitioners’ requestMr. William Rogers was there to represent the petition. The first person signed up to speak was Jim Scearce, who has hunting rights on the adjacent property (owned by Gene Owen). Mr. Scearce was concerned about potential environmental contamination that might occur in the future once the property was zoned M-2, and developed as such. Mr. Scearce stated there was a creek that runs parallel between the 2 properties and he didn’t want to see it contaminated, and wondered if there could be restrictions put on the rezoning that would protect that area. Next to speak was Gene Owens, adjacent property owner, who stated he didn’t want anything put on the property Mr. Rogers wanted to rezone that could damage his adjoining property. No one else had signed up to speak. Mr. Rogers stated that he still lived in the back of that property and would not put anything there that would be harmful not only to himself and his family, but neither to his neighbors. No one else spoke and Mr. Warren closed the hearing at 7:43pm. Motion was made by Mr. Barksdale, seconded by Mr. Davis, to approve rezoning Case R-17-041 from A-1 and RC-1 to M-2, and the following Roll Call Vote was recorded: Mr. Barber-Yes; Mr. Hagerman-Yes; Mr. Blackstock- Yes; Mr. Scearce-Yes; Mr. Davis-Yes; Mr. Barksdale-Yes; and Mr. Warren-Yes. Mr. Blackstock’s motion was unanimously approved by the Board. Board of Supervisors Business Meeting November 28, 2017 Case 4: Nelson Brack Hines & Deborah R. Hines; Tunstall Election District; R-17-042 R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District to A-1, Agricultural District Mr. Warren opened the hearing at 7:47pm. Mr. Sides explained Nelson and Deborah Hines had petitioned to rezone 1.84 acres, located off State Road 950/Tarpley Place in the Tunstall Election District from R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District to A-1, Agricultural District (to combine with the family farm and subdivide for family members). Once the property is rezoned to A-1, all uses listed under Section 35-178 are a permitted use. The Planning Commission, with no opposition, recommended granting the petitioners’ request. Nelson Hines was there to represent the petition. No one signed up to speak and Mr. Warren closed the hearing at 7:48pm. Motion was made by Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. Blackstock, to approve rezoning Case R-17-042, and the following Roll Call Vote was recorded: Mr. Barber- Yes; Mr. Hagerman-Yes; Mr. Blackstock-Yes; Mr. Scearce-Yes; Mr. Davis-Yes; Mr. Barksdale- Yes; and Mr. Warren-Yes. Mr. Barber’s motion was unanimously approved by the Board. Case 5: Casey A. Wolfe & Kimberly Cox Wolfe; Staunton River Election District;R-17-043 R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District to A-1, Agricultural District Mr. Warren opened the public hearing at 7:49pm. Mr. Sides explained Casey Wolfe and Kimberly Cox (Wolfe) hadpetitioned to rezone 5.54 acres, located off State Road 757/Orange Road (on Reservoir View Drive) in the Staunton River Election District from R -1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District to A-1, Agricultural District (to allow for construction of an accessory building to be used for storage and land maintenance). Once the property is rezoned to A-1, all uses listed under Section 35-178 are a permitted use. The Planning Commission, with no opposition, recommended granting the petitioners’ request. Casey Wolfe was there to represent the petition. No one signed up to speak and Mr. Warren closed the hearing at 7:50pm. Motion was made by Mr. Blackstock, seconded by Mr. Barber, to approve rezoning Case R -17- 043 from A-1 to R-1 and the following Roll Call Vote was recorded: Mr. Barber-Yes; Mr. Hagerman-Yes; Mr. Blackstock-Yes; Mr. Scearce-Yes; Mr. Davis-Yes; Mr. Barksdale-Yes; and Mr. Warren-Yes. Mr. Blackstock’s motion was unanimously approved by the Board. This concluded the Rezoning Cases. Public Hearings: Public Hearing to receive citizen input on potentially revising Pittsylvania County Code (“PCC”), Chapter 9, Motor Vehicles and Traffic, to add Article VIII., Video-Monitoring System, Sections 9-201 - 903. Mr. Hunt explained the Pittsylvania County Schools System (“PCS”) had formally requested that the Pittsylvania County Board of Supervisors (“BOS”) adopt a local ordinance, pursuant to authority in Virginia Code § 46.2-844(B), authorizing PCS to install and operate a video-monitoring system in and on school buses operated by PCS for the purposes of recording violations for prosecutorial purposes of individuals that fail to stop for school buses taking on or letting off passengers in violation of Virginia Code § 46.2-844(A). Mr. Warren opened the public hearing at 7:53pm. No one signed up to speak and Mr. Warren closed the hearing at 7:54pm. Motion was made by Mr. Blackstock, seconded by Mr. Davis, to approve amending Chapter 36; Fee Assessment, of the Pittsylvania County Code as presented and the following Roll Call Vote was recorded: Mr. Barber-Yes; Mr. Hagerman-Yes; Mr. Blackstock-Yes; Mr. Scearce-Yes; Mr. Davis-Yes; Mr. Barksdale-Yes; and Mr. Warren-Yes. Mr. Barksdale’s motion was unanimously approved by the Board. Board of Supervisors Business Meeting November 28, 2017 Public Hearing to receive citizen input on a proposed on its plans to undertake equipmentfinancing to expand and improve the County’s emergency communications system. Such expansion and improvements will benefit the residents of the County and will be used by employees of the County and the Tunstall Volunteer Fire and Rescue, Inc. (th e “Department”).The County plans to undertake a lease/purchase equipment financing in an estimated maximum amount of $2,000,000 to pay (a) the costs of new cell towers to be located within the geographic boundaries of the County on a parcel owned by the Department with a street address of 740 Tunstall High Road, Dry Fork, Virginia 24549, and a parcel owned by the County with a street address of 980 Old Mayfield Road, Danville, Virginia 24541, (b) the costs of related equipment and (c) the costs and expenses related to undertaking the lease financing.The Department is a not-for-profit, nonstock Virginia corporation that operates a fire and rescue station located at 740 Tunstall High Road, Dry Fork, Virginia 24549. Its mailing address is P.O. Box 575, Danville, Virginia 24543. The financing will not constitute a debt or pledge of the faith and credit of the Commonwealth of Virginia or any political subdivision thereof, including the County. Neither the Commonwealth of Virginia nor any political subdivision thereof, including the County, shall be obligated to repay the principal or interest components due under the lease/purchase financing arrangement, except from the monies appropriated by the Board Ms. Van Der Hyde explained at the request of Chris Kulp of Hunton & Williams, bond counsel for Pittsylvania County, the County is holding a public hearing tonight to hear citizen input concerning the placement of a E911 tower on the Tunstall Fire & Rescue property. This public hearing is necessary because Tunstall Fire & Rescue is a 501(c)(3) organization. As such, the Internal Revenue Service requires a public hearing since the County will be using 501(c)(3) property for the potential use of financed property. This public hearing was duly advertised in the Star Tribune on November 8, 2017, which satisfies the IRS requirement of local newspaper publication at least 14 calendar days in advance of the public hearing date. The County plans to undertake a lease/purchase equipment financing in an estimated maximum amount of $2 million to pay (a) the costs of new cell towers to be located within the geographic boundaries of the County on a parcel owned by the Department with a street address of 740 Tunstall High Road, Dry Fork, Virginia 24549, and a parcel owned by the County with a street address of 980 Old Mayfield Road, Danville, Virginia 24541, (b) the costs of related equipment and (c) the costs and expenses related to undertaking the lease financing. Lastly, Ms. Van Der Hyde stated that no action was required by the Board on the public hearing itself, other than holding it for citizen input. Mr. Warren opened the public hearing at 7:55pm; no one signed up to speak, and Mr. Warren closed the hearing at 7:57pm. This concluded the public hearings. Presentations Kim Van Der Hyde, as a member of the Danville-Pittsylvania Community Services (DPCS) Board, presented the DPCS FY2017 annual report on services provided by the agency to the communities of Danville and Pittsylvania County. News Business Ms. Van Der Hyde, Finance Director for Pittsylvania County, explained the Computer/Radio/Telecommunications committee has been working to resolve a dead zone issue in several areas of the County for fire and rescue service including the Tunstall area in Dry Fork and the Mayfield Road area near Berry Hill Road. The committee has determined that placing 2 additional towers in these areas would significantly improve radio reception and enable all rescue calls to be received. One tower would be located at Tunstall Fire and Rescue and the Board of Supervisors Business Meeting November 28, 2017 other would be located at the Mayfield Road compactor site location. The cost of this project is anticipated not to exceed $2 million. A resolution must be approved by the Board of Supervisors to proceed with the debt refinance. Ms. Van Der Hyde further explained the 8 original towers were financed by Bank of America in 2012 at a total cost of $13.4 million te be repaid over a 10 year period. Bank of America is willing to refinance this lease to include the 2 additional towers. The new fianan ced amount would be $10,987,800 at an interest rate of 2.26%. This deal would extend the repayment schedule of these towers by 2 years to 2025. Debt service payments will only increase slightly to cover the a small portion of principal and the interest on the additional amount until the last 2 years. The majority of the cost or $1.8 million will be paid in FY2024 and FY2025. Closing on this refinance is scheduled for 12-01-17, if approved. Motion was made by Mr. Davis, seconded by Mr. Barber, that the Board of Supervisors approve the E911 Debt Refinance Resolution (Resolution #2017-11-01) and authorize staff to obtain the necessary signatures to finalize the paperwork needed for closing. The following Roll Call Vote was recorded: Mr. Barber-Yes; Mr. Hagerman-Yes; Mr. Blackstock-Yes; Mr. Scearce- Yes; Mr. Davis-Yes; Mr. Barksdale-Yes; and Mr. Warren-Yes. Mr. Davis’ motion was unanimously approved by the Board. Mr. Jim Davis, Director of Public Safety, explained the County was contracted with Harris Radio regarding the 2 additonal towers, and Harris has submitted Contract Amendment #6 for the installation of the towers. Motion was made by Mr. Blackstock, seconded by Mr. Barber, to approve the contract amendment and the following Roll Call Vote was recorded: Mr. Barber- Yes; Mr. Hagerman-Yes; Mr. Blackstock-Yes; Mr. Scearce-Yes; Mr. Davis-Yes; Mr. Barksdale- Yes; and Mr. Warren-Yes. Mr. Blackstock’s motion was unanimously approved by the Board. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY OF PITTSYLVANIA, VIRGINIA, TO ENTER INTO A SCHEDULE OF PROPERTY UNDER AN EXISTING MASTER EQUIPMENT LEASE PURCHASE AGREEMENT TO FINANCE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE COUNTY’S EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM AND TO REFINANCE CERTAIN OUTSTANDING RENTAL PAYMENTS UNDER THE MASTER LEASE PURCHASE AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF SUCH SCHEDULE OF PROPERTY WHEREAS, the County of Pittsylvania, Virginia (the “County”), and Banc of America Public Capital Corp (the “Lessor”) have previously entered into a Master Equipment Lease Agreement (the “Master Lease Agreement”), and a Schedule of Property No. 1 (“Schedule No. 1”), each dated as of February 24, 2012, to finance the acquisition and installation of certain emergency communications equipment; WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County (the “Board”) desires to finance additional improvements to the County’s emergency communications system, including but not limited to the acquisition, installation and equipping of new cell towers and related equipment RESOLUTION 2017-11-01 Board of Supervisors Business Meeting November 28, 2017 (collectively, the “Equipment”), for use by the County and the Tunstall Volunteer Fire and Rescue, Inc.; WHEREAS, the Lessor has offered to refinance the outstanding rental payments due under Schedule No. 1 (the “2012 Rental Payments”); and WHEREAS, the County Administration has recommended that the County enter into a Schedule of Property No. 2 under the Master Lease Agreement (“Schedule No. 2” and, together with the Master Lease Agreement, the “Lease Agreement”), the form of which has been presented to this meeting, to finance the acquisition, installation and equipping of the Equipment and to refinance the 2012 Rental Payments; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF PITTSYLVANIA, VIRGINIA: 1. The Board (a) has determined that it is in the best interests of the County and its residents to proceed with the lease/purchase financing of the Equipment and the refinancing of the 2012 Rental Payments and (b) authorizes the acquisition, installation and equipping of the Equipment and refinancing the 2012 Rental Payments through the execution of Schedule No. 2 with the Lessor in accordance with the terms of the Master Lease Agreement, the bid of the Lessor dated October 24, 2017 (attached hereto as Exhibit A), and this Resolution. 2. The County Administrator (which term shall include the Assistant County Administrator) is authorized to negotiate with the Lessor and to accept such pricing terms as the County Administrator shall determine to be in the best interests of the County; provided however, that (a) the aggregate amount of principal components of basic rent (the “Basic Rent”) payable under the Lease Agreement shall not exceed $[10,987,800], (b) the Lease Agreement shall terminate no later than December 31, 2026, and (c) the interest components of Basic Rent payable under the Lease Agreement shall bear interest at an annual rate not to exceed 2.26% (exclusive of any interest penalties and subject to adjustment as set forth in the Lease Agreement). The County Administrator is further authorized to determine the payment dates and installment amounts of Basic Rent (comprising both principal and interest components) due under the Lease Agreement and the provisions relating to any prepayment of such Basic Rent (including any make-whole prepayment price). 3. The County Administrator is authorized to execute a final form of Schedule No. 2 substantially in the form presented to this meeting, which is hereby approved, with such completions, omissions, insertions and changes not inconsistent with this Resolution and the Master Lease Agreement as may be approved by the County Administrator. The execution by the County Administrator of Schedule No. 2 and the delivery thereof to the Lessor shall constitute conclusive evidence of the County Administrator’s approval of the final form of Schedule No. 2 and any related completions, omissions, insertions and changes. The officers of the County are authorized and directed to execute and deliver all certificates and instruments, including any project escrow agreement or restricted account agreement, and to take all actions necessary or desirable in connection with the execution and delivery of Schedule No. 2. 4. The County is authorized to grant a security interest in the Equipment acquired with the proceeds under the Lease Agreement as security for the prompt payment when due of amounts payable and the performance by the County of its other obligations under the Lease Agreement. Board of Supervisors Business Meeting November 28, 2017 5. The Board determines that the acquisition and continuing use of the Equipment and the financing of the same through the Lease Agreement are necessary and proper to the efficient operation of the County and will continue to be necessary and proper to the efficient operation of the County through the fiscal year ending June 30, 2027. 6. The undertaking by the County to make payments under the Lease Agreement shall be a limited obligation payable solely from funds to be appropriated from time to time by the Board for such purpose and shall not constitute a debt of the County within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation or a pledge of the faith and credit or the taxing power of the County beyond any fiscal year for which the County has appropriated funds for such purpose. 7. The County believes that funds sufficient to make payment of all amounts payable under the Lease Agreement can be obtained. While recognizing that it is not empowered to make any binding commitment to make such payments beyond the current fiscal year, the Board states its intent to make annual appropriations for future fiscal years in amounts sufficient to make all such payments and recommends that future boards do likewise during the term of the Lease Agreement. The Board directs the County Administrator, or such other officer as may be charged with the responsibility for preparing the County’s annual budget, to include in the budget for each fiscal year during the term of the Lease Agreement an amount sufficient to make all rental payments payable under the Lease Agreement during such fiscal year. 8. The County covenants that it will not take or omit to take any action the taking or omission of which will cause the Lease Agreement to be an “arbitrage bond” within the meaning of Section 148 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and regulations issued pursuant thereto, or otherwise cause interest on the proceeds under the Lease Agreement to be includable in the gross income of the Lessor, and its successors and assigns, under current law. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the County shall comply with any provision of law that may require the County at any time to rebate to the United States any part of the earnings derived from the investment of the gross proceeds under the Lease Agreement, unless the County receives an opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel that such compliance is not required to prevent interest on the proceeds under the Lease Agreement from being includable in the gross income for federal income tax purposes of the Lessor, and its successors and assigns, under existing law. 9. Such officers of the County as may be requested by the County’s special tax counsel are authorized and directed to execute an appropriate certificate setting forth (a) the expected use and investment of the proceeds under the Lease Agreement to show that such expected use and investment will not violate the provisions of Section 148 of the Code and (b) any elections such officers deem desirable regarding rebate of earnings to the United States for purposes of complying with Section 148 of the Code. Such certificate shall be prepared in consultation with the County’s special tax counsel, and such elections shall be made after consultation with such special tax counsel. 10. The County covenants that during the term of the Lease Agreement it shall not permit the proceeds of the Lease Agreement or the Equipment to be used in any manner that would result in (a) 5% or more of such proceeds or the Equipment being used in a trade or business carried on by any person other than a governmental unit or a 501(c)(3) organization (to the extent such use does not constitute unrelated trade or business use), as provided in Section 141(b) of the Code, or (b) 5% or more of such proceeds being used directly or indirectly to make or finance loans to any persons other than a governmental unit or a 501(c)(3) organization (to the Board of Supervisors Business Meeting November 28, 2017 extent such use does not constitute unrelated trade or business use), as provided in Section 141(c) of the Code; provided, however, that if the County receives an opinion of a nationally recognized bond counsel firm that any such covenants need not be complied with to prevent the interest components of basic rent from being includable in the gross income for Federal income tax purposes of the Lessor under existing law, the County need not comply with such covenants. 11. All other actions of the County in conformity with the purposes and intent of this Resolution and in furtherance of entering into the Lease Agreement, financing the acquisition, installation and equipping of the Equipment and refinancing the 2012 Rental Payments are approved and confirmed. 12. All resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict herewith are repealed. 13. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. Ms. Van Der Hyde explained the Board of Supervisors, at their June 20, 2017 meeting, approved a supplement to fund the remainder of FY2017 for the CSA program. At that time, a total of $3,171,830 of state funds and $628,170 of local funds were appropriated to cover FY2017 expenses for CSA services. A total of $1,198,873.18 of state funds and $317,176.94 of local funds remained at the close of June 2017. Since June, a total of $1,536,742.36 has been spent on prior year CSA invoices. Therefore, the funds appropriated back in June need to carryover to the FY2018 year in order to cover these prior year expenses. $1,198,873.18 will come from state funds and $317,176.94 will come from fund balance to cover CSA prior year expenses. These funds were previously approved by the Board on June 20, 2017. A carryover of $1,198,873.18 of state funds and $317,176.94 of local funds needs to be appropriated to the FY2018 budget to cover prior year expenditures, and that a motion to do such would require a 10-Day Layover. Motion was made by Mr. Blackstock, seconded by Mr. Barksdale, to approve and appropriate $1,198,873.18 of state funds and $317,176.94 of local funds to the Community Policy and Management Team Budget for CSA services. As the 10-Day Layover was required, this item will be placed on the December 19, 2017 for discussion and vote. Mr. Hunt explained the following was received from the Honorable Shirley Hammock, Commissioner of the Revenue: Assessments from the State Corporation Commission are made based on the prior year’s information. Based on the yearly filings received in September the assessments are corrected. Virginia PCS Alliance LC assessed for a 2017 tax levy of $6,300.84. When the report was received and reviewed from the SCC, a correction was done resulting in an overpayment in the amount of $6,300.84 fo 2017. After all the corrections were done for the 2017 SCC assessments the net loss was $784.84 from the original levies assessed. The refund is in the amount of $6,300.84; and the Treasurer’s Office has calculated interested owed through November 28, 2017 to be $262.53. The total refund amount, including interest, will be $6,563.37. Motion was made by Mr. Barksdale, seconded by Mr. Davis, to approve the request for the Treasurer to refund the overpayment of $6,300.84 pursuant to Pittsylvania County Code Section 6-6.2 along with the due interest of $262.53 to Virginia PCS Alliance, LC, and the following Roll Call Vote was recorded: Mr. Barber-Yes; Mr. Hagerman-Yes; Mr. Blackstock- Yes; Mr. Scearce-Yes; Mr. Davis-Yes; Mr. Barksdale-Yes; and Mr. Warren-Yes. Mr. Barksdale’s motion was unanimously approved by the Board. Mr. Hunt explained the following was received from the Honorable Shirley Hammock, Commissioner of the Revenue: Assessments from the State Corporation Commission are made 99900.14463 EMF_US 67117285v3 Board of Supervisors Business Meeting November 28, 2017 based on the prior year’s information. Based on the yearly filings received in September the assessments are corrected. When the report was received and reviewed from the SCC, it was discovered Danville Cellular Phone Co. had paid the 2017 in full for the first half and based on the SCC filing, had overpaid. After all the corrections were done for the 2017 SCC assessments the net loss was $20,702.87 from the original levies assessed. Ms. Hammock has recommended that the BOS approve the request for the Treasurer to refund the overpayment of $20,702.87 pursuant to Pittsylvania County Code Section 6-6.2 along with the due interest of $862.61. Motion was made by Mr. Barksdale, seconded by Mr. Davis, to authorize the Treasurer to issue the refund request to Danville Cellular Telephone Company LP, as presented for a t otal amount of $21,565.48, and the following Roll Call Vote was recorded: Mr. Barber-Yes; Mr. Hagerman- Yes; Mr. Blackstock-Yes; Mr. Scearce-Yes; Mr. Davis-Yes; Mr. Barksdale-Yes; and Mr. Warren-Yes. Mr. Barksdale’s motion was unanimously approved by the Board. Mr. Hunt stated Northside High School Musuem, Inc. has submitted an Application for Real Estate Exemption by Designation to the Commissioner of the Revenue’s Office for consideration by the Board. The application is for GPIN #2530-38-6169, located on the corner of Northside Drive and Payne Street Extension in Gretna, Virginia, on which is the musuem’s historical sign commemorating the site of the former Northside High School. The 0.0600 of an acre was deeded to the Museum on October 5, 2017. Assessed value of this parcel is $900, with a $5.31 tax levy. The Museum’s application also asks a retroactive exemption date of October 5, 2017. For such applications to be considered, Mr. Hunt stated a public hearing for citizen input would be required. Motion was made by Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. Scearce, to authorize staff to advertise for a public hearing for citizen input on the proposed amendment to Pittsylvania County Code §6.6-3; Real Estate Property Exemption by Qualifying Classification or Designation to include real estate property known as GPIN #2530-38-6169, located on the corner of Northside Drive and Payne Street Extension in Gretna, Virginia, owned by the Northside High School Museum, Inc., and the following Roll Call Vote was recorded: Mr. Barber-Yes; Mr. Hagerman-Yes; Mr. Blackstock-Yes; Mr. Scearce-Yes; Mr. Davis-Yes; Mr. Barksdale-Yes; and Mr. Warren-Yes. Mr. Barber’s motion was unanimously approved by the Board. Mr. Hunt explained Staff received a petition submitted by Mary Moore, resident of Green Farm Road in the County, requesting the Board of Supervisors to consider amending Pittsylvania County Code (PCC) Section 2.2-22; Running At Large Restriction in Designated Areas, to include Green Farm Road. This road serves as the border between the Dan River and Banister Districts. Ms. Moore has developed a petition in favor of a controlled area defined as the entirety of Green Farm Road. Staff has verified there are 62 property owners on Green Farm Road. Ms. Moore’s petition now has 38 signatures (64.3%) requesting a public hearing for citizen input on amending Pittsylvania County Code (PCC) Section 2.2 -22; Running At Large Restriction in Designated Areas, to include Green Farm Road. Motion was made by Mr. Blackstock, seconded by Mr. Hagerman, to direct staff to advertise a public hearing for a proposed amendment to include Green Farm Road in Section 2.2-22; Running At Large Restriction in a Designated Area, of the Pittsylvania County Code, and the following Roll Call Vote was recorded: Mr. Barber-Yes; Mr. Hagerman-Yes; Mr. Blackstock-Yes; Mr. Scearce-Yes; Mr. Davis-Yes; Mr. Barksdale-Yes; and Mr. Warren-Yes. Mr. Blackstock’s motion was unanimously approved by the Board. Mr. Hicks explained as the cooling season ended this fall, the County began experiencing problems with the 135 ton chiller for the courthouse. Several leaks were detected in the system Board of Supervisors Business Meeting November 28, 2017 and repairs were unable to fix the problems. Several additional attempts were made to repair the unit. The unit will not hold a charge and will not be useable for the 2018 cooling season. This unit was installed in 1991. This unit services the newest portion of the courthouse complex. To develop a set of specifications for a new unit, advertise for bids, award the bids, order the unit and install the unit, we estimate it will take at least 3-4 months, which will put us close to the cooling season. The estimated cost for replacement is $250,000. As the Board would recall, stated Mr. Hicks, the County replaced the 65 ton unit a couple of years ago. Mr. Hicks stated no funds are currently in the FY 17/18 budget. Funding will likely come from unappropriated fund balance, and said Staff would like proceed with the development of an RFP for the replacement of the unit. Motion was made by Mr. Barber, seconded bby Mr. Barksdale, to authorize the County staff to develop and issue an RFP for the replacement of the 135 ton chiller at the Courthouse and authorize the receipt of bids for the project, and the following Roll Call Vote was recorded: Mr. Barber-Yes; Mr. Hagerman-Yes; Mr. Blackstock-Yes; Mr. Scearce-Yes; Mr. Davis-Yes; Mr. Barksdale-Yes; and Mr. Warren-Yes. Mr. Barber’s motion was unanimously approved by the Board. Mr. Hunt explained the Sheriff Department’s existing Unity 100 Harris hand-held radio’s warranty will expire in 2020. In recent meetings with Harris, the Harris LX-200 hand-held radios have been offered at an extremely viable purchase price. These newer radios will still have enough LTE technology for communication even if/when there is no connectivity to the county’s existing tower sites. This would be a sole source purchase in the amount of $229,680.88 for 154 radios; chargers, and bay chargers. The $229,680.88 would come from the 242 Fund; Federal Restrictive Fund Account. Motion was made by Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. Davis, pprove the Sheriff’s request for the purchase of the radios and equipment as presented, in the amount of $229,680.88 charged to the 242 Fund, and noting this is a sole source purchase; and the following Roll Call Vote was recorded: Mr. Barber-Yes; Mr. Hagerman-Yes; Mr. Blackstock-Yes; Mr. Scearce-Yes; Mr. Davis-Yes; Mr. Barksdale-Yes; and Mr. Warren-Yes. Mr. Barber’s motion was unanimously approved by the Board. Mr. Hunt explained the legal deadline for completing the Pittsylvania County, Virginia (the “County”), 2018 General Reassessment is December 31, 2017. Pursuant to legal authority contained in Virginia Code § 58.1-3257, the Pittsylvania County Board of Assessors (“BOA”) has formally requested that the Pittsylvania County Board of Supervisors (“BOS”) approve a 60 - day extension to complete the necessary steps needed to finalize the Assessment and conduct the necessary Appeals. The primary cause of the necessity for said extension is that Assessment clerical staff turn-over has created siginificant challenges in meeting the Decemebr 31, 2017, legal deadline. The BOA anticipates that the General Reassessment will be completed within a 30-day period after December 31, 2017. Motion was made by Mr. Blackstock, seconded by Mr. Barksdale, to approve the Board of Assessors request for a 60-day extension to complete the County’s 2018 General Reassessment and Appeals, and direct the County Attorney to request said extension from the Pittsylvania Circuit Court Judge, and the following Roll Call Vote was recorded: Mr. Barber-Yes; Mr. Hagerman-Yes; Mr. Blackstock-Yes; Mr. Scearce-Yes; Mr. Davis-Yes; Mr. Barksdale-Yes; and Mr. Warren-Yes. Mr. Blackstock’s motion was unanimously approved by the Board. Appointments Motion was made by Mr. Davis, seconded by Mr. Barksdale, to re-appoint Brian Horne as the Dan River Representative on the Pittsylvania County Planning Commission for a four (4) Board of Supervisors Business Meeting November 28, 2017 year term that will commence January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2022., and the following Roll Call Vote was recorded: Mr. Barber-Yes; Mr. Hagerman-Yes; Mr. Blackstock-Yes; Mr. Scearce-Yes; Mr. Davis-Yes; Mr. Barksdale-Yes; and Mr. Warren-Yes. Mr. Davis’ motion was unanimously approved by the Board. Mr. Barber stated he would make his appointment to the Planning Commission for the Turnstall representative at the December 19, 2017 Board’s Business Meeting. Motion was made by Mr. Barksdale, seconded by Mr. Barber, to re-appoint Elton W. Blackstock, Jr. as the Staunton River District Representative on the Pittsylvania County Service Authority for a four (4) year term that will commence December 17, 2017 through December 16, 2021, and the following Roll Call Vote was recorded: Mr. Barber-Yes; Mr. Hagerman-Yes; Mr. Blackstock-Abstained as it was himself being appointed; Mr. Scearce-Yes; Mr. Davis-Yes; Mr. Barksdale-Yes; and Mr. Warren-Yes. Mr. Barksdale’s motion was unanimously approved with 6 votes of the Board, and Mr. Blackstock abstaining from voting. Motion was made by Mr. Blackstock, seconded by Mr. Davis, to appoint Phyllis Roach as the Town of Hurt Representative on the Pittsylvania County Library Board of Trustees for a four (4) year term that will commence July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2021, and the followi ng Roll Call Vote was recorded: Mr. Barber-Yes; Mr. Hagerman-Yes; Mr. Blackstock-Yes; Mr. Scearce-Yes; Mr. Davis-Yes; Mr. Barksdale-Yes; and Mr. Warren-Yes. Mr. Blackstock’s motion was unanimously approved by the Board. Matters From Work Session Mr. Smitherman informed the Board that the Master Lease Program was a line of borrowing capacity for the County tio use for certain projects that leverage real property and would be an action item at their December Business Meeting. One potential project to come before the Board would be to use this to buy out the County’s lease agreement on the Mt. Hermon Library. The buy out could potentionlly save the County $200,000 and secure the improvements that eh Library Foundation is paying for at the currently leased site. The potential savings would occur over a 10-year period, and the County’s load payment would be approximately the same as the current lease payment, plus the County would then own the property at the end of term. The second project the mone would be used for would be Economic Development financing for an undisclosed project the Board is aware of. Third, staff may propose to use the funds to lease and/or purchase obsolete and/or inoperatable equipment at the landfill, which Mr. Hicks informed the Board about at their Work Session. If the Board approved the Master Lease Program, each project would have to be voted on individually by the Board, and a public hearing process would be necessary. Mr. Smitherman stated staff was ready to solitict proposals for use of the Armory. The County has received interest on the property from non-profit, for profit, governmental, and in- house. Proposals will be accepted until the end of January 2018. Mr. Sides asked the Board to review the Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) List for 2018-19 that was included in the Work Session documents, and contact him with any questions or comments they may have. The CEDS List would be on the December 19, 2017 Business Meeting Agenda for approval by the Board as it must be submitted by December 31, 2017 to the West Piedmont Planning District. Board of Supervisors Business Meeting November 28, 2017 Board Announcements Mr. Hagerman stated he had received some complaints from realators at Smith Mountain Lake regarding the ongoing property reassessments made. Mr. Davis thanked the Board for the productive work session and business meeting. Mr. Barksdale stated he attended the Chamber’s event on the LOVE Sign, noting how wonderfully it reflected the County and City. Mr. Warren thanked both Mr. Hancock and Mr. Farmer on their willingness to serve on the Board of Supervisors as the Callands-Gretna representative. Mr. Warren also encouraged everyone who could to attend the Chamber’s Business at Breakfast on December 6, 2017, the topic being Crime Prevention in our area. Adjournment Mr. Warren adjourned the meeting at 8:55pm. __________________________________________ Robert W. “Bob” Warren, Chair Pittsylvania County Board of Supervisors __________________________________________ David M. Smitherman, Clerk Pittsylvania County Board of Supervisors