Loading...
08-19-2014 Adjourned MeetingAdjourned Meeting August 19, 2014 Pittsylvania County Board of Supervisors Tuesday, August 19, 2014 Adjourned Meeting VIRGINIA: The Adjourned Meeting of the Pittsylvania County Board of Supervisors was held on Tuesday, August 19, 2014 in the General District Courtroom of the Edwin R. Shields Addition in Chatham, Virginia. Jessie L. Barksdale, Chairman, called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The following members were present: Jessie L. Barksdale Banister District Tim Barber Tunstall District Coy E. Harville Westover District James Snead Dan River District Brenda H. Bowman Chatham-Blairs District Jerry A. Hagerman Callands-Gretna District Elton W. Blackstock Staunton River District Mr. Clarence C. Monday, County Administrator, Mr. J. Vaden Hunt, County Attorney, Mr. Greg L. Sides, Assistant County Administrator for Planning & Development, Mr. Odie H. Shelton, Jr., Direct of Code Compliance, and Ms. Rebecca Flippen, Deputy Clerk to the Board, were also present. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by the newly appointed Pittsylvania County Youth Commission. Approval of Agenda Motion was made by Mr. Harville, seconded by Mr. Barber, to approve the agenda, which was unanimously approved by the Board Hearing of the Citizens Darlene Doss of the Callands/Gretna District offered a word of prayer. Ms. Doss then commented she was opposed to phone-in of elected official to their scheduled meetings. Phillip Lovelace of the Callands/Gretna District commented the respective boards needed to be very careful when considering changes like those proposed from the setback study as there were items that would adversely affect loans when buying homes, as well as property values, and consequently, tax revenues. Karen Maute of the Westover District thanked the Board and staff for the timely responses she receives when sending emails, and stated she would like to see the County have live streaming of board meetings on their website. Debra Dix of the Chatham/Blairs District made comments opposing changes to the setback ordinances. Ms. Dix felt farmers spreading bio-solids should be solely liable for any imposed setbacks from property lines and not the residential landowner. This concluded the Hearing of the Citizens. Consent Agenda Motion was made by Mr. Harville, seconded by Mr. Blackstock, to approve the Consent Agenda, which was unanimously approved by the Board. (a) Proclamation – September: National Preparedness Month (b) Rural Rustic Resolution – SR694/Davis Road Adjourned Meeting August 19, 2014 Pittsylvania County Board of Supervisors Proclamation National Preparedness Month September 2014 Whereas, “National Preparedness Month” creates an important opportunity for every resident of Pittsylvania County to prepare their homes, businesses, and communities for any type of emergency including natural disasters and potential terrorist attacks; and Whereas, investing in the preparedness of ourselves, our families, businesses, and communities can reduce fatalities and economic devastation in our communities and in our nation; and Whereas, the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Ready Campaign, Citizens Corps, and other federal, state, local, tribal, territorial, private, and volunteer agencies are working to increase public activities in preparing for emergencies and to educate individuals on how to take action ; and Whereas, emergency preparedness is the responsibility of every citizen of Pittsylvania County and all citizens are urged to make preparedness a priority and work together, as a team, to ensure that individuals, families, and communities are prepared for disasters and emergencies of any type; and Whereas, all citizens of Pittsylvania are encouraged to participate in citizen preparedness activities and asked to visit websites of the Ready Campaign at Ready.gov or Listo.gov (in Spanish) and become more prepared; then Therefore, Be It Proclaimed that the Pittsylvania County Board of Supervisors hereby proclaims September 2014 as National Preparedness Month, and encourages all citizens and business to develop their own emergency preparedness plan, and work together toward creating a more prepared society. PITTSYLVANIA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RESOLUTION 2014-08-04 VIRGINIA: At the adjourned meeting of the Pittsylvania County Board of Supervisors held in the General District Courtroom of the Edwin R. Shields Courthouse Addition in Chatham, Virginia on Tuesday, August 19, 2014, the following resolution was presented and adopted: WHEREAS, Section 33.1-70.1 of the Code of Virginia, permits the hard surfacing of certain unpaved roads deemed to qualify for designation as a Rural Rustic Road; and WHEREAS, any such road must be located in a low-density development area and have no more than 1,500 vehicles per day; and Adjourned Meeting August 19, 2014 WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Pittsylvania County, Virginia (“Board”) desires to consider whether Route 694 (Davis Road), From: 0.8 miles east of Business 29 to 1.01 miles east of Business 29, should be designated a Rural Rustic Road; and WHEREAS, the Board is unaware of pending development that will significantly affect the existing traffic on this road; and WHEREAS, the Board believes that this road should be so designated due to its qualifying characteristics; and WHEREAS, this road is in the Board’s six-year plan for improvements to the secondary system of state highways. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Board hereby designates this road a Rural Rustic Road, and requests that the Residency Administrator for the Virginia Department of Transportation concur this designation. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Board requests that this road be hard surfaced and, to the fullest extent prudent, be improved within the existing right-of-way and ditch-lines to preserve as much as possible the adjacent trees, vegetation, side slopes, and rural rustic character along the road in their current state. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Virginia Department of Transportation Residency Administrator. Public Hearings Rezoning Cases Case 1: Glenn and Joanie Nations – Dan River District: R-14-031 Mr. Barksdale opened the public hearing at 7:21pm. Mr. Shelton explained Glenn and Joanie Nations had petitioned to rezone the R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District portion of 18.24 acres (approximately 1.28 acre) to A-1, Agricultural District. They had also petitioned to rezone 1.00 acre from R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District to A-1, Agricultural District (to make the zoning consistent and to combine with the adjacent parcel of land zoned A-1). The properties are located on State Road 728/Hillside Road, in the Dan River Election District. The Planning Commission, with no opposition, recommended granting the petitioners’ request. Glenn and Joanie Nations were present to represent the petition. No one signed up to speak and Mr. Barksdale closed the hearing at 7:21pm. Motion was made by Mr. Snead, seconded by Mr. Barber, to approve rezoning Case R- 14-031 from R-1 to A-1 and the following Roll Call Vote was recorded: Mr. Harville-Yes; Mr. Barber-Yes; Mr. Snead-Yes; Mr. Blackstock-Yes; Ms. Bowman-Yes; Mr. Hagerman-Yes; and Mr. Barksdale-Yes. Mr. Snead’s motion was unanimously approved by the Board. Case 2: Robert M. Pollok, Jr. and Billie S. Pollok – Tunstall District: R-14-032 Mr. Barksdale opened the public hearing at 7:23pm. Mr. Shelton explained Robert and Billie Pollok had petitioned to rezone 2.85 acres, located on State Road 750/Whitmell School Road, in the Tunstall Election District from R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District to A-1, Agricultural District (to combine with the adjacent parcel of land zoned A-1). The Planning Commission, with no opposition, recommended granting the petitioners’ request. Robert Pollok Adjourned Meeting August 19, 2014 was present to represent the petition. No one signed up to speak and Mr. Barksdale closed the hearing at 7:25pm. Motion was made by Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. Snead, to approve rezoning Case R-14-032 from R-1 to A-1 and the following Roll Call Vote was recorded: Mr. Harville-Yes; Mr. Barber-Yes; Mr. Snead-Yes; Mr. Blackstock-Yes; Ms. Bowman-Yes; Mr. Hagerman-Yes; and Mr. Barksdale-Yes. Mr. Barber’s motion was unanimously approved by the Board. Case 3: John R. Valentine and Ruby O. Valentine – Dan River Election District: R-14-033 Mr. Barksdale opened the public hearing at 7:25pm. Mr. Shelton explained that John and Ruby Valentine had petitioned to rezone 0.48 acre, located on State Road 62/Milton Highway, in the Dan River Election District from R-1, Residential Suburban Subdivision District to A-1, Agricultural District (to combine with the adjacent parcel of land zoned A-1).The Planning Commission, with no opposition, recommended granting the petitioner’s request. John Valentine was present to represent the petition. No one signed up to speak and Mr. Barksdale closed the public hearing at 7:26pm. Motion was made by Mr. Snead, seconded by Mr. Harville, to approve rezoning Case R-14-033 from R-1 to A-1 and the following Roll Call Vote was recorded: Mr. Harville-Yes; Mr. Barber-Yes; Mr. Snead-Yes; Mr. Blackstock-Yes; Ms. Bowman-Yes; Mr. Hagerman-Yes; and Mr. Barksdale-Yes. Mr. Snead’s motion was unanimously approved by the Board. Case 4: Burnell Williams & Others– Banister Election District: R-14-034 Mr. Barksdale opened the public hearing at 7:26pm. Mr. Shelton explained that Burnell Williams and Others had petitioned to rezone 55.62 acres, located on State Road 997/Oleander Drive, in the Banister Election District from RC-1, Residential Combined Subdivision District to A-1, Agricultural District (for agricultural use-harvesting timber on the property). The Planning Commission, with no opposition, recommended granting the petitioners’ request. Ill health prevented Mr. Williams from attending so Mr. Shelton said he would answer any questions. No on signed up to speak and Mr. Barksdale closed the public hearing at 7:28pm. Motion was made by Mr. Snead, seconded by Mr. Harville, to approve rezoning Case R-14-034 from RC-1 to A-1 and the following Roll Call Vote was recorded: Mr. Harville-Yes; Mr. Barber-Yes; Mr. Snead- Yes; Mr. Blackstock-Yes; Ms. Bowman-Yes; Mr. Hagerman-Yes; and Mr. Barksdale-Yes. Mr. Snead’s motion was unanimously approved by the Board. This concluded the Rezoning Cases. Public Hearings Public Hearing to receive citizen input on a proposed amendment to the Pittsylvania County Code, Chapter 5-Cemeteries, to add an approximated 0.90 acre tract of land to be used as a cemetery for the Mt. Zion Baptist Church in Gretna, Virginia. This proposed cemetery will be located at 261 Telegraph Road/State Road 685; GPIN # 2550-72-7423; Lot 12 in the Callands-Gretna District. Mr. Barksdale opened the public hearing at 7:29pm. Mr. Monday explained that Mt. Zion Baptist Church, located in Gretna, Virginia, plans to purchase 0.90 acre of land (GPIN #2550-72- 7423, Lot 12) at 261 Telegraph Road/SR 685 for the purpose of forming a cemetery for the church. Since this property is not adjacent to the church, an amendment to Chapter 5; Cemeteries, of the Pittsylvania County Code is required to include the proposed cemetery for Mt. Zion Baptist Church. No one signed up to speak and Mr. Barksdale closed the public hearing at 7:29pm. Motion was made by Mr. Harville, seconded by Mr. Barber, to amend Chapter 5; Cemeteries, of the Pittsylvania County Code to incorporate the Mr. Zion Baptist Church Adjourned Meeting August 19, 2014 Cemetery as advertised and presented. The following Roll Call Vote was recorded: Mr. Harville- Yes; Mr. Barber-Yes; Mr. Snead-Yes; Mr. Blackstock-Yes; Ms. Bowman-Yes; Mr. Hagerman- Yes; and Mr. Barksdale-Yes. Mr. Harville’s motion was unanimously approved by the Board. Public Hearing to receive citizen input on a proposed No Thru Truck Traffic Restriction Engineering Study seeking alternate routes for truck traffic between Hwy 40 and Hwy 57, more specifically for SR 605/Toshes Road (from Hwy 40 to SR 785/Lark Drive); SR 785/Lark Drive (from SR 605 Toshes Road to SR 750 Oxford Road); SR 750/Oxford Road (from SR 785/Lark Drive to SR 649/Anderson Mill Road); SR 750/Green Pond Road (from SR 649/Anderson Mill Road to Hwy 57); SR649/Anderson Mill Road (from SR 750/Oxford Road to SR 799/Climax Road); SR 649/Anderson Mill Road (from SR 799 to US Hwy 29); SR 790/Piney Road (from Hwy 40 to SR 799/Climax Road); SR 799/Climax Road (from/to Hwy 57 to Hwy 40). The Proposed Alternate Routes would be: (1) For trucks to exit off RT 57 (Callands Road), heading north onto SR 969 (Sago Road); continuing north until SR 969 (Sago Road) intersects with SR 626 (Museville Road); continuing on SR 626 (Museville Road) until reaching Hwy 40. (2) For trucks to exit off Hwy 40, heading south onto SR 626 (Museville Road) until intersecting with SR 969 (Sago Road); and continuing south until reaching Hwy 57 (Callands Road). Mr. Monday explained that in their meeting on July 17, 2012, the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing for citizen input on a No Thru Truck Traffic Restriction proposal to be placed on Green Pond Road/State Route 750 coming off of State Route 57 to its intersection with Anderson Road/State Route 800 and along Anderson Road to its intersection with Climax Road/State Route 799; thence north to Virginia State Route 40. The primary comments from citizens in favor of the truck restrictions at that public hearing were Narrow roads were not made for commercial truck traffic and concern to ensure safety of those travelling on roads and residents of those roads. Cost estimates were developed by VDOT staff for road widening in certain areas, estimated at several million dollars, depending on final defined scope of work. In recent months, there has been much discussion about tractor trailer traffic on SR 799/Climax Road and intersecting roads thereof and discussion for engineering study concerning No Thru Truck Traffic Restrictions could be performed by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). At their May 5, 2014 meeting the Board approved sending a request to VDOT for a Speed Study to be conducted in the Climax area. On August 15, 2014, the County Administrator’s office received the following Speed Study Summary from VDOT: 1. SR 649/Anderson Mill Road; will be reduced to 45 MPH from SR 750/Green Pond Road to SR 799/Climax Road 2. SR 750/Green Pond Road; will be reduced to 45 MPH from SR 750/Green Pond Road to SR 799/Climax Road 3. SR 790/Piney Road; will be reduced to 45 MPH from SR 799/Climax Road to HWY 40/West Gretna Road 4. SR 799/Climax Road; will be reduced to 45 MPH from HWY 40/West Gretna Road to HWY 57/Callands Road 5. SR 750/Oxford Road; speed limit will remain the same 6. SR 804/Double Bridge Road; speed limit will remain the same Adjourned Meeting August 19, 2014 7. Other safety items to be implemented:  Installation of additional curve warning signs in various locations  Refreshing of existing pavement markings  New speed limit signs are already up and alerts posted for awareness of new speed limits Mr. Monday further explained that the public hearing had been duly advertised. He told the Board that No action was required tonight. However, it will take action by this Board, if it is the will of the Board, to forward a formal Resolution to VDOT requesting a No Thru Truck Traffic Restriction Engineering Study for the Proposed Alternate Route. If the Board opts to submit such a request it is recommended that the County staff work with the VDOT staff to prepare the actual resolution for the Board’s consideration, and if the Board opts to submit such a request, it is an intensive process, possibly taking up to nine months following receipt of the request. Mr. Barksdale opened the public hearing at 7:36pm. The following persons spoke in opposition of SR626/Museville Road and SR969/Sago Road being used as alternate truck routes: Carol Cooper, Joe David, Nathan Hammock, Tonya Finney; and Tommy Aylor; for the following reasons: (1) traffic from the eight roads wanting restrictions to be feed into the Museville Road; (2) the road is barely 18-feet wide in the best areas; (3) no speed limit signs posted except in the bad turns; (3) just the weekend prior to this public hearing an incident involving a commercial truck blocked for through traffic for several hours; (4) concerns for safety in meeting trucks in the narrow, winding roads that are unfamiliar with the area; and (5) the roads needed upgrading already for the residential traffic there, which would be extremely expensive and if that would done it still would not accommodate commercial truck traffic. Mr. Hammock also stated that when he supported the idea of road improvements on the Museville and Sago Roads, he did not realize the improvements were for the intent of making it an alternate truck route. The following persons made comments opposed to restricting truck traffic and supported the lower speed limits: Chad Shelton, Brad Fuller, Carolyn Moon, Roger Jefferson; Kenneth Scruggs; Chuck Angier; and Tony Fox for the following reasons: (1) the problem has not been the trucks using the roads, the problem has been speeding, primarily from the cars using the roads; (2) widening of the Climax Road would solve the majority of the problem; (3) roads should not be closed anywhere since that always hinders someone’s business but road conditions need to be considered and improved for everyone using the roads; (4) roads need to be kept open for commerce: (5) anytime roads are restricted it places a greater burden on the roads left open for commercial traffic. Letters were received in the County Administrator’s office from the following persons also in opposition of the advertised restrictions: Max Kendall; the Agricultural Development Board; and MeadWestVaco Corporation. The following persons from the Climax corridor were in favor the implementing the No Thru Truck Traffic Restrictions based on their concerns for safety, quality of life, and the roads not designed or safely suitable for commercial truck traffic: Brenda Brooks; Brenda Amos; a letter from Skip Stroble read by Brenda Brooks; Lettie Campbell; Anthony Campbell; and a letter from Arlene Pilcer read by Mary Edmunds. The following persons spoke in approval of the recently reduced speed limits: Annegret Wiegmann and Arthur Brunner. Janet Bishop, Chatham Town Council, asked the Board to be mindful of unintended consequences in restricted traffic. Mary Catherine Plaster reminded the Board that all of the areas involved in this issue: the Museville/Sago/Callands area; the Climax corridor; and the Town of Chatham are all communities state and federally designated as historic communities. No one else signed up to speak and Mr. Barksdale closed the hearing at 8:30pm. Mr. Hagerman stated that the misconception of local trucks traveling the roads was not the problem; it was the commercial trucks using the roads as thoroughfares that has been the issue; that he did not misrepresent anything to anyone is this building at the hearing; and he did not want anyone in the Adjourned Meeting August 19, 2014 County to be hurt by truck traffic. Mr. Barksdale thanked everyone who came out to speak, that the Board would not be taking any action that evening, and that the Board would be looking for impacts of the reduced speed limits. This concluded the Public Hearings. Unfinished Business At the Board of Supervisors August 4, 2014 meeting, a motion was made by Mr. Harville, seconded by Mr. Snead, to approve the reappropriation of funds as follows: : $60.00 to County Attorney-Office Supplies (100-4-012210-6001), $199.67 to Clerk of Courts-Copier Lease (100-4-021600-60051), $506.00 to Sheriff-Parts (100-4-031200-6030), $300.00 to Sheriff- Labor (100-4-031200-6031), $11,395.92 to E911-Telephone (100-4-035500-5230), $35.40 to E911-Office Supplies (100-4-035500-6001), $14,537.45 to WIA-Other Operating (251-4- 353853-6014). This motion required a 10-Day Layover that had now been met and the following Roll Call Vote was recorded: Mr. Harville-Yes; Mr. Barber-Yes; Mr. Snead-Yes; Mr. Blackstock-Yes; Ms. Bowman-Yes; Mr. Hagerman-Yes; and Mr. Barksdale-Yes. Mr. Harville’s motion was unanimously approved by the Board. New Business Motion was made by Ms. Bowman, seconded by Mr. Barber, to approve a proclamation from the Pittsylvania County Board of Supervisors for the countywide cleanup for October 2014. The proclamation contains a special action by the Board of Supervisors for the citizens to bring in any of their trash to the landfill Friday, October 17, 2014 from 7:30am until 3:30pm on AND from 10:00am until 2:00pm on Saturday, October 18, 2014, waiving the tipping for the citizens to bring in their trash to the landfill. The County is only limited by the items it can take in at the landfill that must be non-hazardous and permitted under the County’s permit. The following Roll Call Vote was recorded: Mr. Harville-Yes; Mr. Barber-Yes; Mr. Snead-Yes; Mr. Blackstock-Yes; Ms. Bowman-Yes; Mr. Hagerman-Yes; and Mr. Barksdale-Yes. Ms. Bowman’s motion was unanimously approved by the Board. Pittsylvania County Board of Supervisors Proclamation COUNTYWIDE CLEANUP During October 2014 “Keeping Our Communities Clean” Whereas, Pittsylvania County is rich in beauty and natural resources; and Whereas, the Board of Supervisors of Pittsylvania County and the Pittsylvania County Beautification Committee strive to improve the quality of life in our community through enhanced community awareness, education, and public/private partnerships working together on projects that keep our environment clean and free of debris, beautify our neighborhoods and public spaces, and instill pride and a sense of ownership in our community; and Whereas, every citizen can contribute to the protection and preservation of the beauty of Pittsylvania County by participating in a countywide cleanup campaign; and Adjourned Meeting August 19, 2014 Whereas, Pittsylvania County Citizens realize a cleanup effort is needed to display pride in our community for ourselves, our visitors, and for industrial prospects; and Whereas, a countywide cleanup campaign will engage individuals to take greater responsibility for improving their community’s environment through the three main focus areas of litter prevention, waste reductions and recycling, and beautification; and Whereas, the Pittsylvania County Board of Supervisors will sponsor a “Take Your Trash to the Landfill On Us” from 7:30am until 3:30pm on Friday, October 17, 2014 AND from 10:00am until 2:00pm on Saturday, October 18, 2014, waiving tipping fees for citizens bringing their trash to the landfill on those days; then Now, Therefore, Be It Proclaimed, that the Pittsylvania County Board of Supervisors proclaims October 2014 as Countywide Cleanup Month in Pittsylvania County, Virginia, and encourages all communities, civic and professional groups, businesses, churches, schools, families and individual citizens to take an active role in making the communities in Pittsylvania County a more beautiful place to live, work and play. Motion was made by Mr. Snead, seconded by Mr. Harville, to approve Twin Branch LP’s request for reimbursement of Solid Waste Fees paid in the taxable year of 2013 totaling $5,040.00 and direct the Treasurer’s Office to reimburse this amount to Twin Branch LP for the following reason: The Pittsylvania County Board of Supervisors, under the terms and provisions of § 58.1-3916 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, implemented a Solid Waste Fee of $5 per month per household to every owner or operator of any house, apartment, rental house, rental residential unit, multiple residential unit, trailer camp or trailer court that became effective July 1, 2012. This fee is billed twice a year with the regular Real Estate Tax levy due December 5th and June 5th each year. Effective July 1, 2013, Section 17-13; Payment of Solid Waste Fee, and as authorized by §15.2-2159(A) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, states “no fee shall be levied upon persons whose residential waste is not disposed of in the County’s landfill, provided said nondisposal is documented by the reasonable satisfaction of the Commissioner of Revenue’s Office, by the collector of generator of such waste.” Letters addressed to the County Administrator’s office and the Pittsylvania County Treasurer’s office from the Honorable Samuel W. Swanson, Jr., Commissioner of the Revenue for Pittsylvania County in which Mr. Swanson states Twin Branch LP meets the requirements of Sec. 17-13 and Sections 58.1-3990 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, for Twin Branch LP’s request to the Commissioner of Revenue’s Office to be reimbursed $5,040.00 paid towards Solid Waste Fees in the 2013 taxable year. Ms. Bowman made a substitute motion, seconded by Mr. Hagerman, to table the issue until more information was available on the location of Twin Branch L P, how many units were involved, and why the cost was so how. Ms. Bowman’s substitute motion failed by a 2-5 vote, with Mr. Harville, Mr. Barber, Mr. Snead, Mr. Blackstock and Mr. Barksdale in opposition. Mr. Snead’s main motion to approve the refund passed by a 5-2 majority vote, with Ms. Bowman and Mr. Hagerman in opposition. Motion was made by Mr. Snead, seconded by Mr. Barber, to approve the appropriations total of $881,531.93 in 2014 carryovers, which required a 10-Day Layover. Mr. Blackstock stated that he was in opposition of the $30,000 concerning the current animal facility, and the additional $105,000 for the Blairs water/sewer line, and felt both of these items needs to be referred back for discussion in the Finance Committee, and the animal facility money in the Animal Welfare Facility Committee also. Adjourned Meeting August 19, 2014 Motion was made by Mr. Snead, seconded by Mr. Harville, to accept the Selective Enforcement – Alcohol Grant (pass-through grant from the National Highway Safety Administration for Federal Fiscal Year 2015) that includes $27,800 in federal funds and $13,900 local cash match for a total of $41,700, noting that funds not spend by June 30, 2015 would be carried over into the FY 2015-16 year, and that the $13,900 local match will come from the Sheriff’s Budget Line 100-4-031200-600800-Fuels/Vehicles, and authorize the County Administrator to sign all necessary documentation. Mr. Snead’s motion was unanimously approved by the Board. Motion was made by Mr. Harville seconded by Mr. Blackstock, to appropriate an additional $4,764.00 to the Commissioner of Revenue’s part-time salary line (100-4-012310- 1300) due to an increase in state revenues for his office. The following Roll Call Vote was recorded: Mr. Harville-Yes; Mr. Barber-Yes; Mr. Snead-Yes; Mr. Blackstock-Yes; Ms. Bowman-Yes; Mr. Hagerman-Yes; and Mr. Barksdale-Yes. Mr. Harville’s motion was unanimously approved by the Board. Board Announcements Ms. Bowman stated she would like another Board member to serve with her on the Youth Advisory Committee for the Youth Commission and asked that any Board member interested to contact her. Mr. Harville made comments and had pictures available of all the phone books thrown out at the end of every driveway in the County. He stated he had made a complaint to Verizon and the Richmond office about what an eyesore it was creating throughout the County. Mr. Barksdale informed the Board that meetings were being organized with Dr. Martha Walker for Strategic Planning Sessions. Adjournment Motion was made by Mr. Harville, seconded by Mr. Snead, to adjourn, which was unanimously approved by the Board. The meeting adjourned at 9:00pm. __________________________________________ Jessie L. Barksdale, Chairman Pittsylvania County Board of Supervisors __________________________________________ Clarence C. Monday, County Administrator Pittsylvania County Board of Supervisors